Parallel Computational Fluid Dynamics 1999 2000
DOI: 10.1016/b978-044482851-4.50051-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel Computations of Unsteady Euler Equations on Dynamically Deforming Unstructured Grids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison between results with valid experimental 36 and numerical 37 articles for NACA 0012 airfoil M=0.755,k=0.0814, αm=2.51, α0=0.016.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparison between results with valid experimental 36 and numerical 37 articles for NACA 0012 airfoil M=0.755,k=0.0814, αm=2.51, α0=0.016.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…31 Figure 8 presents the comparison of the calculated lift coefficient versus the instantaneous angle of attack with the experimental and numerical results. 36,37 Uzun 37 used a parallel algorithm to solve inviscid unsteady flow in a dynamic unstructured mesh, while here, the static network is employed with oscillation at the boundary condition. Both numerical methods do not have a good consistency with experimental results at the low angles of attack which is obtained under neglecting the viscosity effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computed variation of the lift coefficient versus angle of attack for inviscid and viscous flows during the third cycle is compared with that Landon [14] and Uzun [15] and in Figure 8. The existence of this variation loop is the result of induced velocities, which result in different lift coefficients between the up and down strokes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 8b shows the C l versus α for inviscid case. Uzun [15] non moving mesh with oscillation of flow boundary condition is applied. It can be seen that both methods are not good agreement with experimental data particularly at the lowest angle of attack.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subproject is sponsored at Langley under the Efficient Aerodynamics and Shapes Integration (EASI) project, under the Vehicle Systems Program. A NASA symposium for COMSAC [1,2] held in Hampton, Virginia on September [23][24][25]2003 brought together over 100 attendees from over 35 organizations to initiate dialog between the S&C and CFD communities, to begin assessment of the state-of-the-art in S&C prediction methods, and to explore how best to pool our resources and energies toward the COMSAC goals. While such a task is daunting, some promising activities and partnerships are beginning to emerge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%