2006
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.049619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel Changes in Global Protein Profiles During Long-Term Experimental Evolution in Escherichia coli

Abstract: Twelve populations of Escherichia coli evolved in and adapted to a glucose-limited environment from a common ancestor. We used two-dimensional protein electrophoresis to compare two evolved clones, isolated from independently derived populations after 20,000 generations. Exceptional parallelism was detected. We compared the observed changes in protein expression profiles with previously characterized global transcription profiles of the same clones; this is the first time such a comparison has been made in an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
130
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
11
130
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect on infection of these three mutations was found to be contingent on the initial hrcV (T3SS À ) mutation carried by the CBM356 ancestor, reinforcing previous evidence that evolution is thrifty (Pelosi et al, 2006). The vsrA mutation alone did not allow the wild-type chimera CBM124 to nodulate, in agreement with the fact that vsrA does not control the T3SS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The effect on infection of these three mutations was found to be contingent on the initial hrcV (T3SS À ) mutation carried by the CBM356 ancestor, reinforcing previous evidence that evolution is thrifty (Pelosi et al, 2006). The vsrA mutation alone did not allow the wild-type chimera CBM124 to nodulate, in agreement with the fact that vsrA does not control the T3SS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…2f). Interestingly, these are systemic and coordinated responses resulting from a single mutation showing that it acts through multiple mechanisms, as others have reported 2,23 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The availability of technology to rapidly identify mutations in adapted strains, and then evaluate the contributions of those mutations to adaptation with genetic manipulation, has greatly accelerated the understanding of the mechanisms for adaptation to new substrates (Brockhurst et al, 2010). Genomic changes promoting adaptation to new substrates have included mutations that enhance the kinetics of enzymes acting on the substrate (Fong et al, 2005a, b;Herring et al, 2006;Conrad et al, 2009;Lee and Palsson, 2010) and mutations in promoter regions and global regulatory elements (Treves et al, 1998;Herring et al, 2006;Pelosi et al, 2006); as well as RNA polymerases (Herring et al, 2006;Conrad et al, 2010). Surprisingly, there have been fewer reports of adaptation to the use of a new substrate via mutations in known transcriptional regulators (Philippe et al, 2007;Barrick et al, 2009) despite the fact that changes in transcriptional regulators are thought to have key roles in the evolution of new microbial species (Dekel and Alon, 2005;Babu and Aravind, 2006;Babu et al, 2007), a concept further supported with the observation that transcriptional regulatory networks evolve and change faster than other collaborative biological networks such as protein interaction networks and metabolic pathway networks (Shou et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%