2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10686-014-9405-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel blind deconvolution of astronomical images based on the fractal energy ratio of the image and regularization of the point spread function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several analytical PSF reconstruction algorithms are proposed for different telescopes including on-axis PSF reconstruction (Jolissaint et al 2012), off-axis PSF reconstruction (Witzel et al 2014) for ordinary AO systems, PSF reconstruction for ground layer adaptive optic system (Peter 2010;Villecroze et al 2012), multi-object adaptive optic system (Martin et al 2016) and multi-conjugate adaptive optic system (Gilles et al 2018). These analytical PSF reconstruction algorithms can provide PSFs for image deconvolution (Fusco et al 2000;Jia et al 2014). However, reconstructed PSFs provided by these algorithms need additional wavefront measurements and are effective only within the field of view of AO systems.…”
Section: Classic Psf Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several analytical PSF reconstruction algorithms are proposed for different telescopes including on-axis PSF reconstruction (Jolissaint et al 2012), off-axis PSF reconstruction (Witzel et al 2014) for ordinary AO systems, PSF reconstruction for ground layer adaptive optic system (Peter 2010;Villecroze et al 2012), multi-object adaptive optic system (Martin et al 2016) and multi-conjugate adaptive optic system (Gilles et al 2018). These analytical PSF reconstruction algorithms can provide PSFs for image deconvolution (Fusco et al 2000;Jia et al 2014). However, reconstructed PSFs provided by these algorithms need additional wavefront measurements and are effective only within the field of view of AO systems.…”
Section: Classic Psf Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These properties indicate us that although texture features are not organized in a regular way for solar images, the relative weights of different texture features are stable, which means if we measure the relative weights of texture features in a statistical way, the probability distribution in the same wavelength should be the same. We can use multifractal properties to describe texture features in solar images (Jia et al 2014;Peng et al 2017). The multi-fractal property of texture features means the spatial distribution of textures in solar images (coded by texture features) satisfies the same continuous power spectrum and for different scales, the exponents of the spectrum are different.…”
Section: The Multi-fractal Property Of Texture Features In Solar Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In different wavelengths, solar images are different and these images are composed of different texture features as shown in Figure 1. Texture features in solar images may be self-similar and these images are usually called fractal (Jia, Cai, and Wang, 2014), such as the granulation. In other wavelengths, they are not self-similar in the whole spatial scale, which means they can not be described by a spectrum with the same exponent.…”
Section: Principle Of the Perception Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%