1996
DOI: 10.1006/jpdc.1996.0096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel Algorithms for VLSI Layout Verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main limiting factor in these cases is dealing with geometry operations that need connectivity information for correct output and how this information is handled across partitions. A previous paper [5] presented a parallel design rule checking framework that can handle data parallelism but it does not present any clear solutions for dealing with connectivity information across partitions. There has been some work on data-parallel DRC solutions for specific machine architectures [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The main limiting factor in these cases is dealing with geometry operations that need connectivity information for correct output and how this information is handled across partitions. A previous paper [5] presented a parallel design rule checking framework that can handle data parallelism but it does not present any clear solutions for dealing with connectivity information across partitions. There has been some work on data-parallel DRC solutions for specific machine architectures [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The work described in this paper is part of an ongoing project called ProperCAD [15] which is aimed at developing an integrated suite of parallel applications for VLSI CAD that run on a variety of parallel platforms. In the past, various tools have been developed to solve the problems at lower levels in the VLSI CAD hierarchy, namely, placement [16], routing [17], circuit extraction [18], design rule checking [26], logic synthesis [27], [27], test generation [25], [29], fault simulation [28], and behavioral simulation [23]. In this paper,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%