2006 International Conference on Parallel Processing (ICPP'06)
DOI: 10.1109/icpp.2006.57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel Algorithms for Evaluating Centrality Indices in Real-world Networks

Abstract: This paper discusses fast parallel algorithms for evaluating several centrality indices frequently used in complex network analysis. These algorithms have been optimized to exploit properties typically observed in real-world large scale networks, such as the low average distance, high local density, and heavy-tailed power law degree distributions. We test our implementations on real datasets such as the web graph, protein-interaction networks, movie-actor and citation networks, and report impressive parallel p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
141
0
5

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
141
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…• Second, although some parallel approaches for computing exact betweenness have been proposed [17,18,19,20,21], in general, it is still very costly for billion-node graphs. A straightforward parallel compuation of the exact betweenness has complexity Ω(|V | 2 ) [19], which is prohibitive on big graphs.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Second, although some parallel approaches for computing exact betweenness have been proposed [17,18,19,20,21], in general, it is still very costly for billion-node graphs. A straightforward parallel compuation of the exact betweenness has complexity Ω(|V | 2 ) [19], which is prohibitive on big graphs.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of our metric can be further reduced if the algorithm is parallelized, which is a matter of parallelizing the single-source shortest paths (SSSP) and the accumulation functions in Brandes' algorithm [33], considering unweighted networks. This is feasible [34], [35], [36], [37] and the graph traversal performed in the SSSP needs to be run ρ + 1 times to find all the paths we need to compute the ρ-geodesic betweenness. In addition, if only local knowledge is available, it is possible to modify a distributed algorithm as the one proposed by Lehman and Kaufman [38] to compute our metric.…”
Section: Random Walk Vs ρ-Geodesic Between-nessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very important topic for distributed applications is Big Data management and more specifically the generation of large-scale social networks graphs where the number of nodes reaches very large numbers. Analysis of such networks is of importance in many areas, e.g., data mining, network sciences, physics, and social sciences [3]. The need for efficient and scalable methods of network generation is frequently mentioned in the literature [8], particularly for the preferential attachment process [1,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%