2004
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallel acquisition techniques in cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging using TrueFISP sequences: Comparison of image quality and artifacts

Abstract: Purpose:To compare image quality, artifacts, and signalto-noise ratio (SNR) in cardiac cine TrueFISP magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with and without parallel acquisition techniques (PAT). Materials and Methods:MRI was performed in 16 subjects with a TrueFISP sequence (1.5 T; Magnetom Sonata, Siemens): TR, 3.0 msec; TE, 1.5 msec; flip angle (FA), 60°. Three axes were scanned without PAT (no PAT) and using the generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) and modified sensitivity encoding… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, SNR was not directly measured due to the inherent inhomogeneous spatial distribution of the iPAT images (22)(23)(24)(25). Further studies should be performed to consider the contrast ratio of abdominal lesions and background organs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, SNR was not directly measured due to the inherent inhomogeneous spatial distribution of the iPAT images (22)(23)(24)(25). Further studies should be performed to consider the contrast ratio of abdominal lesions and background organs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique is mainly used for T2-weighted imaging. To make the dynamic imaging faster, True-FISP was combined with generalized auto-calibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) 9) , a parallel and keyhole imaging technique 13) . In order to optimize the imaging parameters, the effects of the number of receiver coils used, receiving bandwidth, slice thickness, and flip angle on each image were determined.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wintersperger et al (5) have reported that CNR is decreased with increased acceleration (51% decrease at acceleration factor [R] = 4, 86% decrease at R = 7) and that CNR losses are accompanied by a reduction in image quality. Hunold et al (25) have revealed a 34-49% reduction in SNR for R = 2. SNR and CNR loss can impair the visualization of small endocardial trabeculation, resulting in inferior delineation of endocardial trabeculation which may have led to underestimation of LV volumetric parameters (7,16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%