2002
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.300.2.588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paradoxical Effects of the Opioid Antagonist Naltrexone on Morphine Analgesia, Tolerance, and Reward in Rats

Abstract: Opioid agonists such as morphine have been found to exert excitatory and inhibitory receptor-mediated effects at low and high doses, respectively. Ultra-low doses of opioid antagonists (naloxone and naltrexone), which selectively inhibit the excitatory effects, have been reported to augment systemic morphine analgesia and inhibit the development of tolerance/physical dependence. This study investigated the site of action of the paradoxical effects of naltrexone and the generality of this effect. The potential … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
88
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
88
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Co-administration or post-treatment with an ultralow dose of naltrexone or naloxone was found to potentiate the antinociceptive effect of morphine on the neuropathic thermal hyperalgesia in rats (Powell et al, 2002), and extends the duration of analgesia in morphine-tolerant rats (Powell et al, 2002;Wang et al, 2005). The mechanism has been hypothesized to be due to the inhibition of the excitatory signaling of opioid receptors (Shen and Crain, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Co-administration or post-treatment with an ultralow dose of naltrexone or naloxone was found to potentiate the antinociceptive effect of morphine on the neuropathic thermal hyperalgesia in rats (Powell et al, 2002), and extends the duration of analgesia in morphine-tolerant rats (Powell et al, 2002;Wang et al, 2005). The mechanism has been hypothesized to be due to the inhibition of the excitatory signaling of opioid receptors (Shen and Crain, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…73 Interestingly, the doses of NTX used in this study are 10-to 100-fold higher than the NTX doses shown to enhance analgesia and prevent tolerance in intact animals yet 100-fold to 1000-fold lower than doses used to block opioid analgesia via MORs. 25,35,50,56,74,84 Although we believe this to be the first study to assess oral delivery of an ultra-low-dose opioid antagonist in animals, a direct comparison with intrathecal NTX was possible with the study by Powell et al 56 The multitude of neuroplastic changes underlying neuropathic pain, including the extent of MOR-G s coupling now thought to be controlled by filamin A, 73 may contribute to the need for somewhat higher doses of NTX in alleviating hypersensitivities in nerve-injured animals compared with NTX doses reported to enhance opioid analgesia in intact rodents.In conclusion, the present work demonstrates that SNL injury, like chronic opioid treatment, induces G s coupling by MOR. This aberrant signaling may contribute to the excitatory neurotransmission in spinal dorsal horn after neuropathic injury as well as to the decreased efficacy of endogenous and exogenous MOR agonists in alleviating neuropathic pain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the effects of opiate antagonism on conditioned reward, let alone incubation of reward craving, have not as yet been extensively characterized, we selected a broad dose range for our study. Previous researchers (Glass et al 1999;Ciccocioppo et al 2002;Colantuoni et al 2002;Powell et al 2002;Pickering and Liljequist 2003;D'Anci and Kanarek 2004;Leri and Burns 2005;Olmstead and Burns 2005) have described behaviorally relevant effects of naloxone and the similar naltrexone in the ultralow (down to 1 pg/kg), very low (30 ng/kg), and moderate (1-5 mg/kg) to relatively high dose range (up to 20 mg/kg). We chose doses in the submoderate to high range as doses into the very low/ultralow range may antagonize by nonclassic (non receptor-blocking) mechanisms (Olmstead and Burns 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%