2002
DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2002)383<0001:plsooi>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Paradox Lost”: Skeletal Ontogeny of Indostomus paradoxus and Its Significance for the Phylogenetic Relationships of Indostomidae (Teleostei, Gasterosteiformes)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pietsch 1978;Johnson and Patterson 1993;Britz and Johnson 2002;Keivany and Nelson 2006;Kawahara et al 2008;Wilson and Orr 2011). A comprehensive morphological and phylogenetic survey of the group, primarily based on osteology was conducted by Orr (1995) in a sadly underused thesis of considerable insight and breadth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pietsch 1978;Johnson and Patterson 1993;Britz and Johnson 2002;Keivany and Nelson 2006;Kawahara et al 2008;Wilson and Orr 2011). A comprehensive morphological and phylogenetic survey of the group, primarily based on osteology was conducted by Orr (1995) in a sadly underused thesis of considerable insight and breadth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Orr (1995), the Macroramphosa includes a pair of sister groups, the Centriscoidea (centriscids and macroramphosids) and Syngnathoidea (pegasids, solenostomids and syngnathids). He proposed 13 unique centriscoid characters, of which three (sphenotic articulating with hyomandibula through a ventral Britz and Johnson (2002) process; neural spine of the second preural centrum fully developed; anterior body encased by interconnected dermal plates; Figs. 2b, 3 and 4) have been observed in Gerpegezhus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based upon seven derived characters, monophyly of the Gasterosteiformes was proposed cladistically by Johnson and Patterson (1993), Britz and Johnson (2002) later adding the unique development of the pectoral girdle as further support. Although molecular data (Miya et al, 2003) subsequently showed the gasterosteiforms to be nonmonophyletic, the traditional framework of the order (i.e., Nelson, 1994) is followed here, because only three taxa (Gasterosteus, Hypoptychus, and Indostomus) were sampled in the molecular study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A composite nature of "obliquus ventralis 1" and "rectus ventralis 1" is suggested for Solenostomus. Britz and Johnson (2002) argued that Indostomidae should be included in the Gasterosteoidei (sensu Pietsch, 1978), rejecting a close affinity between that family and the syngnathoid Pegasidae, as proposed by Pietsch (1978) and Johnson and Patterson (1993). Although Indostomus and Pegasus are unique in Gasterosteiformes in having a large epibranchial 4 and pharyngobranchial 3, the associated muscles and their arrangements are generally basic in Indostomus (see Tables 2,3), but specialized in Pegasus (as in syngnathoids, having well-developed recti ventrales interni and externi).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%