2012
DOI: 10.1177/1742715012444054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paradox in harmony: Formulating a Chinese model of leadership

Abstract: Drawing upon indigenous Chinese models, perspectives and concepts, the article proposes an idealised model of harmonious leadership that is grounded in the concepts of Tao (way), Te (power) and Ho (harmony). Various approaches to modelling Chinese leadership are reviewed and four major impediments that have handicapped this work are identified. In an effort to overcome these impediments, the authors suggest the use of the hermeneutic method as a means of engaging more deeply with the Chinese leadership literat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might partially resolve the misfit of certain ambiguous leadership perceptions in the current dichotomous ILT frameworks (positive versus negative or prototypical versus anti-prototypical). Third, our research extends our current understanding of contradictory and paradoxical leadership dialectics (Collinson, 2014;McElhatton and Jackson, 2012;Nyberg and Sveningsson, 2014;Zhang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This might partially resolve the misfit of certain ambiguous leadership perceptions in the current dichotomous ILT frameworks (positive versus negative or prototypical versus anti-prototypical). Third, our research extends our current understanding of contradictory and paradoxical leadership dialectics (Collinson, 2014;McElhatton and Jackson, 2012;Nyberg and Sveningsson, 2014;Zhang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The dominant Anglo-Saxon writings present leadership with an essence around individualism, heroism, linearity and masculinity (Alvesson and Spicer, 2012; Ford, 2010; Ford et al., 2008; Knights and McCabe, 2015). However, there has been an increasing interrogation and suspicion that the seemingly consented naturalisation of Anglo-centric perceptions of leadership might belie alternative constructions (Edwards, 2015; Ford, 2010; McElhatton and Jackson, 2012; Prince, 2005; Steyeart and Janssens, 2013; Sveiby, 2011; Turnbull et al., 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then describe the methodology used to collect data from subordinates over two time periods, as well as managers from a large privately owned internet company in China. The Chinese context is appropriate for testing our proposed relationships because the workplace culture in many Chinese companies emphasizes both partnership and deference (McElhatton and Jackson, 2012). This particular organizational context provided an opportunity to test our hypotheses in an environment that depends on partnerships between managers and subordinates, and generalizes to other dynamic and highly competitive organizations around the globe.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%