2007
DOI: 10.1177/0011000006292597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paradigms, Purpose, and the Role of the Literature

Abstract: The authors have identified three areas that are central to the rationale for conducting a qualitative research project, yet which produce confusion and uncertainty for some psychologists trained in traditional research methods. In this article, they consider how philosophy of science paradigms relate to the foundational rationale for qualitative inquiry and present suggestions for how researchers can formulate a statement of purpose and research questions that are congruent with an identified paradigm. They e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, we also agree with Haverkamp and Young (2007) that "achieving a match between purpose and paradigm enhances the credibility of one's research" (p. 275). Although these authors were referring to QUAL research, we believe this reference is equally applicable to QUAN and MM.…”
Section: The Need For Congruence and Completenesssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Consequently, we also agree with Haverkamp and Young (2007) that "achieving a match between purpose and paradigm enhances the credibility of one's research" (p. 275). Although these authors were referring to QUAL research, we believe this reference is equally applicable to QUAN and MM.…”
Section: The Need For Congruence and Completenesssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In the open coding phase, the analysis team performed line-by-line open coding of the transcript from the interview at the end of interval 1. The investigators then established a preliminary set of codes through consensus coding (Haverkamp and Young, 2007). After creating the initial codebook, LR stepped away from the analytical discussions to serve as an external auditor of the analytic process and findings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A qualitative, interpretivist approach was used for this study (Haverkamp & Young, 2007;Kvale & Brinkmann, 2009) as the authors were interested in uncovering the multiple, subjective practice experiences of evangelical Christian occupational therapists. We sought participant narratives about a particular experience-practising as an occupational therapist while holding specific religious beliefs-by asking about everyday experiences, focusing on the meaning participants made of those experiences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%