Paradigms of Public Administration

Ugyel, Lhawang

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40280-2_2

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 76 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These policies are blindly modeled by government officials solely to conform to the prevailing paradigm. The natural consequence of such an action is the widening of the class gap, causing economic corruption and weakening political accountability (16). Contrary to the claim just made, public administration is not solely about "management."…”

Section: New Public Management In Developing Countriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Need for Multi-Sectoral Partnerships in the Healthcare of Islamic Developing Countries During the Coronavirus Pandemic

Motamedi

Vaezi

Alvani

et al. 2021

JCHR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays, the field of healthcare is facing difficult issues in a way that both public and private sectors are fully aware of their inability to address emerging public health-related issues without the help of the other sector. Accordingly, public-private partnerships are put on the agenda in policy-related issues as a mechanism of cooperation between the public and private sectors to take into account the interests of both parties in the related contracts .From the late of 2019, the world is struggling with a new virus called the coronavirus, which has already cost a lot to the health sector. The partnership between the government and the private sector is very important to get through the corona period since the government alone cannot be responsible for the negative effects of the virus in the field of health. Considering the successes and failures of countries in the implementation of partnership models, a question arises as to how such partnerships for health development strategies can be attractive and effective in developing Islamic countries. In addition to the review of theoretical foundations of the subject and examining the development process of public-private partnerships, the study emphasizes the use of the third sector capacities. It further reviews the endowments and charitable affairs in the framework of multi-sectoral partnerships to develop health in the community with all available potentiality. The theoretical framework of the research includes the four steps of policy-making in the country, creating common perspectives among stakeholders, ensuring key success factors in the project, and reviewing the achievements of participation are considered. These policies are described after classifying and reconstructing the components in the research literature.

show abstract

Section: New Public Management In Developing Countriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Need for Multi-Sectoral Partnerships in the Healthcare of Islamic Developing Countries During the Coronavirus Pandemic

Motamedi

Vaezi

Alvani

et al. 2021

JCHR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The implementation of the performance management system of the PCS faced many challenges. In a study of the evaluation of the PCS (Ugyel, 2016; Ugyel & O’Flynn, 2017), there were major problems faced, particularly with the implementation of the performance management system. The first problem was that the forms were perceived to be difficult and the process cumbersome.…”

Section: Challenges Implementing Performance Management Reforms In Bhmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There have been two major performance management reform initiatives in Bhutan. The first performance management reform was implemented in 2006 and was one of the main components of the Position Classification System (PCS) implemented by the Royal Civil Service Commission (RCSC; see Ugyel, 2016) for a comprehensive description of the PCS). The second reform was only just recently implemented in 2017, Managing for Excellence (MaX), again implemented by the RCSC.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Decade of Performance Management Reforms in Bhutan: Problems and Prospects

Ugyel

2017

South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bhutan has implemented two bold performance management reforms within the last decade. These reforms are based on the business and neoclassical economics models focusing on outputs and strict performance measures. The first of these reforms, performance management system, was implemented as one of the main components of the Position Classification System (PCS) reforms in 2006. The second reform, Managing for Excellence (MaX) was introduced in 2017. Both these reforms have sought to improve the performance of the public sector in Bhutan. However, the implementation of the performance management system faced major challenges. This commentary describes the two performance management reforms, and briefly examines some of the challenges in their implementation.

show abstract

Paradigms of Public Administration

Cited by 2 publications

References 76 publications

The Need for Multi-Sectoral Partnerships in the Healthcare of Islamic Developing Countries During the Coronavirus Pandemic

The Need for Multi-Sectoral Partnerships in the Healthcare of Islamic Developing Countries During the Coronavirus Pandemic

A Decade of Performance Management Reforms in Bhutan: Problems and Prospects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About