Paradigms, host classes, and ancillariness: A comparison of three approaches to grammatical status

Konvička, Martin

doi:10.1515/9783110682564-010

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Others see the semantic shift as primary and formal changes rather as a subsequent development (Traugott 2002;Breban 2014;Smirnova 2015). Recent comments warn that formal changes cannot serve as diagnostics of grammaticalization and should be kept separate in analysis (Detges & Waltereit 2002;von Mengden & Simon 2014;Konvička 2019). There remains a need to explain why "processes that need not be causally connected to one another are, nonetheless, so often observed to cluster" (Wiemer 2014:426).…”

Section: Declaration Of Conflicting Interestsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Could Be it’s Grammaticalization: Usage Patterns of the Epistemic Phrases (it) Could/Might Be

Lorenz

2023

Journal of English Linguistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Starting from the assumption that grammaticalization is rooted in situated language use, the present study tests the connection between functional reanalysis and formal reduction with a synchronic approach. It investigates a case of potential (but not actuated) grammaticalization in Present-Day English, the use of epistemic phrases of the type it could/ might be ( that), which can serve an adverbial function and undergo formal reduction in analogy to maybe. These phrases are analyzed in British English (spoken data and informal writing) for their syntactic complementation and for omission of the expletive subject it. The results show that omission rates are overall higher in “critical contexts,” that is, where the item is structurally ambiguous between a clause and an adverbial, though other usage types, such as idioms, may promote it-omission too. The findings suggest that formal reduction ( it-omission) is connected to incipient/potential grammaticalization (critical contexts) even in the absence of a diachronic grammaticalization process. Thus, they provide evidence that the oft-observed correspondence between functional and formal changes emerges immediately in synchronic language use. A possible interpretation is that certain linguistic elements have a base potential for being put to more grammatical uses; while these uses need not initiate change, speakers tend to adapt the form to its function.

show abstract

Section: Declaration Of Conflicting Interestsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Could Be it’s Grammaticalization: Usage Patterns of the Epistemic Phrases (it) Could/Might Be

Lorenz

2023

Journal of English Linguistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Paradigms, host classes, and ancillariness: A comparison of three approaches to grammatical status

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Could Be it’s Grammaticalization: Usage Patterns of the Epistemic Phrases (it) Could/Might Be

Could Be it’s Grammaticalization: Usage Patterns of the Epistemic Phrases (it) Could/Might Be

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About