1997
DOI: 10.1159/000259224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paradigms and Paradoxes: Mouse (and Human) Models of Genetic Deafness

Abstract: Mouse models have proved valuable tools in the analysis of human genetic disorders. The identification of the genes mutated in classical mouse mutants and the analysis of the phenotype of mutants following targeted gene disruption have provided some clarification of the development and functioning of the inner ear. A number of these genes also play a role in human deafness. Analysis of mutations in both human and mouse deafness genes has identified a number of distinct phenomena that contribute to the observed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of these patients show primary abnormalities of the sensory neuroepithelia of the inner ear, as do several hearing‐impaired mouse mutants (Fekete, 1999; Gasparini et al ., 1999; Probst & Camper, 1999). In recent years, mouse mutants have played an important role in the identification of human hereditary hearing loss genes (Steel, 1995; Hughes, 1997; Fekete, 1999; Probst & Camper, 1999). To date, numerous different genetic conditions associated with hearing impairment have been described, and several of the genes involved in these forms have been mapped and identified, showing that myosin and connexin mutations and mitochondrial dysfunction can lead to deafness (Martini et al ., 1997; Steel et al ., 1997; Koehler et al ., 1999; Redowicz, 1999; Skvorak Giersch et al ., 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these patients show primary abnormalities of the sensory neuroepithelia of the inner ear, as do several hearing‐impaired mouse mutants (Fekete, 1999; Gasparini et al ., 1999; Probst & Camper, 1999). In recent years, mouse mutants have played an important role in the identification of human hereditary hearing loss genes (Steel, 1995; Hughes, 1997; Fekete, 1999; Probst & Camper, 1999). To date, numerous different genetic conditions associated with hearing impairment have been described, and several of the genes involved in these forms have been mapped and identified, showing that myosin and connexin mutations and mitochondrial dysfunction can lead to deafness (Martini et al ., 1997; Steel et al ., 1997; Koehler et al ., 1999; Redowicz, 1999; Skvorak Giersch et al ., 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other recent reviews can be consulted for further information (e.g. Steel and Brown, 1994;Steel, 1995;Petit, 1996;Hughes, 1997;Van Camp et al, 1997;Fischel-Ghodsian, 1998).…”
Section: The Mouse As a Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Immortomouse illustrates the case of specific gene insertion. Although there are few exam ples of this approach in hearing research, gene deletions, or knockouts, have recently con firmed the critical functions of genes such as the transcription factor Brn3.1, whose dele tion leads to complete loss of hair cells [3,4], the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor 3. whose deletion leads to specific structural de fects in supporting-cell differentiation in the organ of Corti [5][6][7][8], and the growth factors brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and neurotrophin-3, whose deletions lead to degeneration of specific populations of neu rons to the sensory epithelia [9], These exam ples of targeted deletion are achieved by pre paring defective DNA sequences Hanked by sequences homologous to those of the tar get genes. The aim is to inactivate the gene by inserting a piece of foreign DNA into its normal sequence.…”
Section: Transgenic Micementioning
confidence: 99%