Familie Der Zukunft 1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-322-92535-0_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paradigmen des Nichtehelichenrechts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From 1969 on, the youth office was the legal custodian and guardian ad litem of all non-marital children in order to establish paternity, child support and inheritance entitlements. Until 1997, the guardianship of the youth office was not terminated unless the mother named the child's father; the underlying reason for this was the best interest of the child (Willenbacher, 1991(Willenbacher, , 1995. Although the legal custodianship of youth offices was abolished and the autonomy of unmarried mothers to initiate paternity suits was acknowledged through the 1997 family law reform, 5 naming the father and cooperating in procedures to establish paternity are still prerequisites when the right to advanced child maintenance payments is at stake.…”
Section: Legal Traditions In Family Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 1969 on, the youth office was the legal custodian and guardian ad litem of all non-marital children in order to establish paternity, child support and inheritance entitlements. Until 1997, the guardianship of the youth office was not terminated unless the mother named the child's father; the underlying reason for this was the best interest of the child (Willenbacher, 1991(Willenbacher, , 1995. Although the legal custodianship of youth offices was abolished and the autonomy of unmarried mothers to initiate paternity suits was acknowledged through the 1997 family law reform, 5 naming the father and cooperating in procedures to establish paternity are still prerequisites when the right to advanced child maintenance payments is at stake.…”
Section: Legal Traditions In Family Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%