1969
DOI: 10.1037/h0026946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paradigmatic difference in acquisition-pair retention.

Abstract: The recognition of the acquisition pairs was tested before and after the test trials of two chaining paradigms, a response-equivalence paradigm, a stimulus-equivalence paradigm, and a general facilitation paradigm, X-Y, B-Z, A-C. The second-stage pairs were recognized on almost all tests. The first-stage pairs were recognized less often and the frequency of recall was highest for the equivalence paradigms, less for the chaining paradigms, and lowest for the general facilitation paradigm. The test-pair terms we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 0 publications
references
References 15 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance

No citations

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?