Paradigm shifts in critical care medicine: the progress we have made

Abstract

There have really been no single, major, advances in critical care medicine since the specialty came into existence. There has, however, been a gradual, continuous improvement in the process of care over the years, which has resulted in improved patient outcomes. Here, we will highlight just a few of the paradigm shifts we have seen in processes of critical care, including the move from small, closed units to larger, more open ICUs; from a paternal "dictatorship" to more "democratic" team-work; from intermittent to continuous, invasive to less-invasive monitoring; from "more" interventions to "less" thus reducing iatrogenicity; from consideration of critical illness as a single event to realization that it is just one part of a trajectory; and from "four walls" to "no walls" as we take intensive care outside the physical ICU. These and other paradigm shifts have resulted in improvements in the whole approach to patient management, leading to more holistic, humane care for patients and their families. As critical care medicine continues to develop, further paradigm shifts in processes of care are inevitable and must be embraced if we are to continue to provide the best possible care for all critically ill patients.

Artificial Intelligence in Neurointensive Care Unit: A Cautious Leap into Future

“…3 AI can assist not only in administering repetitive patient assessment in real time, but also in integrating and interpreting these data source with EHR data, thus potentially enabling more timely and targeted interventions. 4,5 Closed-loop AI systems can monitor parameters of patients; then, directly treat patients and induce changes in those very parameters that are undergoing monitoring. These systems can make direct real-time adjustments to patient care without any human input.…”

The feasibility and reliability of actigraphy to monitor sleep in intensive care patients: An observational study

“…The paradigm shift of Intensive Care Units (ICU) to be more person centred has identi ed sleep quality and quantity as an issue for patients receiving care, that can mitigate recovery and contribute to protracted ICU length of stay [16]. However, these person-centred aspects of care are often negated due to the rapid development, and advancement of technology that is employed within ICU intended to support survival [17]. Increasingly, the contribution of sleep in the recovery process and the overall care of the patient in the ICU, has emerged as an aspect of clinical care that has garnered considerable attention.…”

Intervention fidelity in postintensive care follow‐up consultations at ten sites in the RAPIT‐trial: A mixed‐methods evaluation

“…Worldwide million patients require treatment in ICU and survival is expected to rise due to the ageing population and advances in critical care medicine (Vincent & Creteur, 2015). Critical illness can lead to the development of new or worsen impairments, termed as "Post Intensive Care Syndrome" (PICS).…”