1970
DOI: 10.1307/mmj/1029000524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paracompactness of locally compact Hausdorff spaces.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prove the next theorem we will use a well-known result, Lemma 3.3.2 (See [24]). If E → M is a finite rank vector bundle over a manifold, then Γ c (E) is a projective C ∞ (M)-module.…”
Section: Renormalizations Feynman Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prove the next theorem we will use a well-known result, Lemma 3.3.2 (See [24]). If E → M is a finite rank vector bundle over a manifold, then Γ c (E) is a projective C ∞ (M)-module.…”
Section: Renormalizations Feynman Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then B is a commutative regular ring and I is a non-projective ideal of B (cf. Bkouche [3], Finney and Rotman [5]). In the particular case where X is the example above, I is the union of the increasing chain of principal ideals corresponding to the intervals [0, α], for α < ω 1 .…”
Section: Proposition 43 Let a And B Be Chains And Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case where F = R, Theorem 10.3 is known [50], [64]. The following result was proved by Brooksher [53] in the case F = IR.…”
Section: S(coo) C_ Xmentioning
confidence: 99%