2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2016.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parabolic projective functors in type A

Abstract: Abstract. We classify projective functors on the regular block of RochaCaridi's parabolic version of the BGG category O in type A. In fact, we show that, in type A, the restriction of an indecomposable projective functor from O to the parabolic category is either indecomposable or zero. As a consequence, we obtain that projective functors on the parabolic category O in type A are completely determined, up to isomorphism, by the linear transformations they induce on the level of the Grothendieck group, which wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is extended in [MM6] to more general 2-categories and (slightly) more general classes of 2representations. Some nice applications of these classification results were obtained in [KM1].…”
Section: Introduction and Description Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This is extended in [MM6] to more general 2-categories and (slightly) more general classes of 2representations. Some nice applications of these classification results were obtained in [KM1].…”
Section: Introduction and Description Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In [30], classification of simple transitive 2-representation for the 2-category of Soergel bimodules in type A (cf. Theorem 11) was used to classify indecomposable projective functors on the principal block of BGG category O for sl n .…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of this problem is supported by interesting applications, see e.g. [KiM1]. The case of the algebra A treated in this paper differs significantly from all previously studied cases.…”
Section: Introduction and Description Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%