1991
DOI: 10.1049/ip-f-2.1991.0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parabolic equation modelling of the effects of multipath and ducting on radar systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
5

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
44
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The first one (most commonly used with the SSF solution of the PE) consists in the insertion of an artificial absorbing layer adjacent to the concerned boundary. Within this layer, the discretized field is "filtered" applying a suitable attenuation function [42,45,58] or the reflection is removed by adding a small imaginary part to the refractive index near the extended computational window boundary [37]. A variation of the absorbing layer approach, also often used with the SSF PE solution, is the Perfectly Matched Layer (PML) technique, firstly proposed for electromagnetic waves application in Berenger [81].…”
Section: Ssf Solution To the Pementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first one (most commonly used with the SSF solution of the PE) consists in the insertion of an artificial absorbing layer adjacent to the concerned boundary. Within this layer, the discretized field is "filtered" applying a suitable attenuation function [42,45,58] or the reflection is removed by adding a small imaginary part to the refractive index near the extended computational window boundary [37]. A variation of the absorbing layer approach, also often used with the SSF PE solution, is the Perfectly Matched Layer (PML) technique, firstly proposed for electromagnetic waves application in Berenger [81].…”
Section: Ssf Solution To the Pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it has been mentioned, the sophisticated ray methods (GTD, UTD (Uniform Theory of Diffraction)) and normalmodes methods (or hybrid combinations of them), which overcome the difficulties experienced by the simple ray theory in complex propagation environments (caustics, shadow zones, ducted propagation), are not easy to include in routine calculations. The great flexibility demonstrated by the PE has turned its simplest form (1) into the preferred technique for solving tropospheric propagation problems in a number of thoroughly validated and practically applied radiowave propagation assessment tools as: VTRPE (Variable Terrain Radio Parabolic Equation, solution of (1) based on SSF) [94], PCPEM (PC Parabolic Equation Model, SSF based) [37], TPEM (Terrain Parabolic Equation Model, uses SSF) [45], TER-PEM (TERrain Parabolic Equation Model, successor of PCPEM, combines PE and ray-trace techniques) [95], TEMPER (Tropospheric Electromagnetic Parabolic Equation Routine, based on DMFT) [69], [72], APM (Advanced Propagation Model, hybrid model that uses ray optics and DMFT-based PE) [73], PREDEM (PREdiction of ElectroMagnetic Detection) [96], AREPS (Advanced Refractive Effects Prediction System) [97]. Some of the limitations of this widely spread modeling of the 3D environment with 2D PE are discussed below.…”
Section: Validation Of the Pe And Limitations Of 2d Pementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More specifically, Barrios [12,13] treated horizontally inhomogeneous environments and a terrain model respectively. Craig and Levy [14] applied the Split…”
Section: Parabolic Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7. A PC-based version of the parabolic equation model (PEM) (PCPEM), PCPEM is used for the assessment of the effects of the atmosphere on the propagation performance of radar and communications systems at frequencies from VHF to millimeter waves [Craig and Levy, 1991]. PCPEM does not use the terrain profile as input except in the sense of a smooth spherical Earth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%