2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.02.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ParaAT: A parallel tool for constructing multiple protein-coding DNA alignments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
202
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 344 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
202
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Otherwise the longest available partial sequence was selected. Filtered sequences were grouped by orthology using ParaAT1.0 102 , then aligned and translated using MACSE version 1.01b 103 with default parameters. In total, 11,254 groups of orthologous genes were retained for comparative genomic analyses (Supplementary Table 9).…”
Section: Comparative Genomic Analyses Orthologue Identification and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise the longest available partial sequence was selected. Filtered sequences were grouped by orthology using ParaAT1.0 102 , then aligned and translated using MACSE version 1.01b 103 with default parameters. In total, 11,254 groups of orthologous genes were retained for comparative genomic analyses (Supplementary Table 9).…”
Section: Comparative Genomic Analyses Orthologue Identification and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trees were drawn with iTOL (Letunic and Bork, 2011). A coding sequence alignment for Ka/Ks ratio estimation was prepared with ParaAT (Zhang et al, 2012b). The Ka/Ks ratio was calculated in KaKs_ Calculator using all of the implemented methods (Zhang et al, 2006), and this ratio was averaged over all the predictions.…”
Section: Tree Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to analyse the substitutions within the coding sequences of both pAsa2 and pAsa7, each nucleotide sequence was codon-aligned using MUSCLE version 3.8.31 (Edgar, 2004) through ParaAT.pl version 1.0 (Zhang et al, 2012). The synonymous and non-synonymous substitutions were evaluated by DAMBE version 6.1.6 (Xia, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%