“…101 Not only was the king the supreme commander of the military, the sole creator of new laws and very wealthy as the administrator of the temple; he was also too often the victim of his own megalomaniacal lust, "striving to become the one who would unite all of southern Mesopotamia into a single centralized state under a single ruling hand -his own." 102 Once again, however, democracy -in one guise or another -seems to have survived this early political shift towards autocracy. Although there was no doubt that the king held the supreme authority of the state, there are a number of examples where the long tradition of assemblies continued throughout Mesopotamia and further abroad.…”