than the anterolateral PM (69% versus 31%). The increased vulnerability of the posteromedial PM is likely related to its blood supply, which is usually dependent on 1 artery (either the right coronary artery [RCA] or the left circumflex coronary artery [LCX]), whereas the anterolateral PM is supplied by 2 arteries (the left anterior descending coronary artery [LAD] and the LCX). 18 This was further supported by Chinitz et al 14 who demonstrated that in patients with posteromedial PM infarction the LCX was the infarct-related artery in 33% and the RCA in 67%, whereas the LAD was never involved. Conversely, in patients with anterolateral PM infarction, the LAD was the infarct-related artery in 72% of patients, the LCX in 22%, and the RCA in 6%. 14 Third, there seems to be some variability in the clinical correlates associated with PM infarction. Chinitz et al 14 demonstrated that patients with PM infarction had larger infarct size on MRI (16.0±10.9% of the LV versus 12.3±8.9% in patients without PM involvement; P<0.05). In these patients, myocardial scar most often involved the lateral and inferior walls. In addition, the infarct-related artery was more often the RCA or LCX. Similar findings were reported in the current study by Eitel et al 15 ; patients with PM infarction had delayed reperfusion, more often multivessel disease, and a lower frequency of LAD as infarct-related artery and anterior infarction. On MRI, these patients had larger infarct size, scar more often observed in lateral and inferior walls, less myocardial salvage, increased microvascular obstruction, more intramyocardial hemorrhage, and larger LV volumes with impaired LV function. 15 Finally, the various studies that used contrast-enhanced MRI to detect PM infarction have also (to some extent) evaluated the relation with MR. Okayama et al 12 evaluated 60 patients with contrast-enhanced MRI at 25±47 months after infarction; 53% of patients had 1 or both PMs involved. From the same MRI examination, the mitral valve (presence of regurgitation, systolic retraction of the leaflets, annular size) and the left ventricle (function and sphericity) were evaluated. Patients with involvement of both PMs demonstrated larger LV volumes, lower LV ejection fraction, and worse LV sphericity index. These patients had more severe MR associated with mitral annular dilatation, reduced leaflet coaptation, and systolic retraction of the leaflets (expressed as a larger mitral valve tenting area).12 Chinitz et al 14 performed the MRI <27±8 days after infarction and used echocardiography to assess the severity of MR. Among the total study population, moderate to severe MR was present in 14%; these patients had worse LV function, LV dilatation, mitral annular dilatation, increased tenting height, and reduced leaflet coaptation.14 On contrastenhanced MRI, the patients with MR had more frequent lateral wall infarction (which remained an independent predictor on the multivariable analysis). However, PM infarction was not associated with MR in multivariable analysis. Eitel...