Uterine adenosarcoma is a rare tumor of Müllerian origin and is characterized by a benign glandular component and a sarcomatous usually low‐grade, stroma, We examined 11 cases of Müllerian adenosarcoma, eight cervical, two uterine and one of the peritoneum. Tissue protruding from the cervix and an initial diagnosis of a cervical polyp were common findings for most patients with uterine adenosarcoma. On repeated examination these cases were re‐evaluated as Müllerian adenosarcomas. Histologic examination revealed benign glands with a sarcomatous stroma, which typically formed periglandular cuffs of increased cellularity. The saromatous stroma was homologous in four cases but contained heterologous elements, such as striated muscle, lipoblasts and cartilage in three cases; in one case a sarcomatous overgrowth of stromal elements was found. The question of a Müllerian adenofibroma vs adenosarcoma was raised in three cases. According to stromal cellularity, stromal atypia and mitotic rate, the cases were classified as adenosarcomas. Sarcomatous overgrowth, presence of heterologous elements and high mitotic rate seem to indicate poor prognosis. Flow cytometry showed a predominantly diploid population of cells in eight cases of adenosarcoma. An aneuploid cell population was seen in three cases of adenosarcoma and in all but one case of carcinosarcoma studied as controls. Gynecologists and pathologists should be aware of the difficulties and delay in the diagnosis of Müllerian adenosarcoma in cases when the tumor presents as a benign looking cervical polyp. Flow cytometric DNA analysis might serve as a useful tool in the diagnosis of Müllerian adenosarcoma vs carcinosarcoma and contribute to the prognostic evaluation in different histologic subsets of the tumor.