2016
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-108641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline

Abstract: Guideline 657Testoni Pier Alberto et al. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP… Endoscopy 2016; 48: 657-683 This Guideline is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). It provides practical advice on how to achieve successful cannulation and sphincterotomy at minimum risk to the patient. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
475
4
22

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 440 publications
(508 citation statements)
references
References 196 publications
(217 reference statements)
7
475
4
22
Order By: Relevance
“…9 It has been recommended that advanced techniques (e.g., precut sphincterotomy) should only be performed by skilled endoscopists as defined by those who achieve biliary cannulation in > 80% of cases using standard methods. 29 Restraint and recognizing the need for caution are advisable with the goal toward avoiding unnecessary and/or high-risk ERCP. Restraint may be appropriate during evaluation of the potential procedure indications and patient risk factors (see below).…”
Section: Physician Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…9 It has been recommended that advanced techniques (e.g., precut sphincterotomy) should only be performed by skilled endoscopists as defined by those who achieve biliary cannulation in > 80% of cases using standard methods. 29 Restraint and recognizing the need for caution are advisable with the goal toward avoiding unnecessary and/or high-risk ERCP. Restraint may be appropriate during evaluation of the potential procedure indications and patient risk factors (see below).…”
Section: Physician Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,37,38 Reasonable definitions for difficult cannulation range from cannulation attempts for > 5-10 minutes, > 5-15 cannulation attempts, and/or > 1-5 inadvertent pancreatic duct manipulations. 11,29,31 In situations where biliary cannulation is difficult and repeated pancreatic cannulation occurs, some experts advocate a double guidewire technique (DGWT) to increase success. [39][40][41][42] There are, however, reports of increased PEP with DGWT 43,44 and the risk is considerably higher (20%-30%) when pancreatic stents are not placed for prophylaxis (see below).…”
Section: Procedures Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 At times, anatomy such as the shape, size or consistency of the ampulla, the position of the ampulla with a nearby diverticulum, gastrointestinal stricture or altered anatomy from prior surgery may contribute to the complexity.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] The currently described technique allowed successful cannulation and safe sphincterotomy in our Billroth II patient with the use of a conventional side-viewing duodenoscope and standard sphincterotome. To our knowledge, this approach has not been previously reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%