2014
DOI: 10.1039/c3ra47688j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paper microfluidic extraction and direct smartphone-based identification of pathogenic nucleic acids from field and clinical samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while these systems are portable and easy to use, they require microfabrication and are not optimized for multiplexing or multiple target detection. More recently, paper microfluidic devices have been described for a multitude of assays (Cahrillo et al, 2009;Martinez et al, 2008;Nie et al, 2010), including a highly sensitive and rapid multiplexed platform detecting Salmonella in poultry packaging, whole blood and feces utilizing a smartphone (Fronczek et al, 2014). While these systems have greatly improved on previous soft lithography-based microfluidics technology in terms of fabrication, ease-of-use, and portability, they still require expensive reagents and show some experimental variation due to inconsistencies in the backscattering of the paper fibers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, while these systems are portable and easy to use, they require microfabrication and are not optimized for multiplexing or multiple target detection. More recently, paper microfluidic devices have been described for a multitude of assays (Cahrillo et al, 2009;Martinez et al, 2008;Nie et al, 2010), including a highly sensitive and rapid multiplexed platform detecting Salmonella in poultry packaging, whole blood and feces utilizing a smartphone (Fronczek et al, 2014). While these systems have greatly improved on previous soft lithography-based microfluidics technology in terms of fabrication, ease-of-use, and portability, they still require expensive reagents and show some experimental variation due to inconsistencies in the backscattering of the paper fibers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Good progress has been made in these efforts, specifically in bacterial assays. Direct bacterial nucleic acid detection has been attempted in lateral flow format (Mao et al, 2009;Lo et al, 2013;Baeumner, 2004) and paper microfluidic format (Fronczek et al, 2014;Costa et al, 2014), and these assays are fairly rapid and show good sensitivity, with the limit of detection being typicallyo10 3 colony forming units (CFU) per mL. However, these formats often require sample pre-treatment, separate nucleic acid extraction, or separate thermocycling, and sometimes lack specificity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At the entrance of the sample preparation stage, the channel will split in two: one channel for nucleic acid extraction and the other for particle-conjugated antibody capture. Nucleic acid extraction will be accomplished through paper microfluidics, 184 during which the nucleic acid will be tagged with preloaded fluorophores. The channel will split into several subchannels of preloaded nucleotides specific for a range of targets of interest (different targets in different channels), and a process of positive selection will be used to sort specific pathogens.…”
Section: A Portable Rapid and Sensitive Multiplexed Sensor For Bioamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective integration of the two key technologies critically empowers MS 2 for many mobile sensing applications. Current applications of MS 2 cover detection of various environmental and health indicators such as pH (Lopez-Ruiz et al 2014), nitrite , heavy metal (Chen et al 2014b;Wang et al 2014), bacterial contamination (Hutchison et al 2015;San Park et al 2013;Zhu et al 2012), blood glucose (Chun et al 2014), proteins (Chan et al 2015;Lillehoj et al 2013;Preechaburana et al 2012;You et al 2013) and other pathogen-associated biomarkers (Fronczek et al 2014;Stemple et al 2014;Yeo et al 2016). Some complicated assays such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Chen et al 2014a;Wang et al 2011) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Liao et al 2016;Stedtfeld et al 2012) were successfully implemented with the MS 2 systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%