2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Paper, face-to-face and on my mobile please”: A survey of women’s preferred methods of receiving antenatal education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that almost all the parous and 50% of the nulliparous women reported the Internet as the main source of knowledge, and less than one-fifth of the participants reported that they received the information at the hospital during antenatal consultations or when they were admitted to the hospital in a previous delivery. We need to consider that women who did not attend antenatal education programs and wanted to be prepared for childbirth and postpartum also used this resource to obtain information 19 .…”
Section: Figure 1 Knowledge Of Non-pharmacological Techniques For Pai...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that almost all the parous and 50% of the nulliparous women reported the Internet as the main source of knowledge, and less than one-fifth of the participants reported that they received the information at the hospital during antenatal consultations or when they were admitted to the hospital in a previous delivery. We need to consider that women who did not attend antenatal education programs and wanted to be prepared for childbirth and postpartum also used this resource to obtain information 19 .…”
Section: Figure 1 Knowledge Of Non-pharmacological Techniques For Pai...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 12 publications included primary research papers: one qualitative (Arcia et al., 2019); six quantitative (Chen et al., 2022; Ciochan et al., 2022; Grimes et al., 2014; Kovala et al., 2016; Kuciel et al., 2021; Wright et al., 2020); four quasi‐experimental (Doaltabadi & Amiri‐Farahani, 2021; O'Sullivan et al., 2019; Shahid & Johnson, 2018; Tsai et al., 2018); and one randomized controlled trial (Krusche et al., 2018) from eight countries in total (Australia; Canada; China; Iran; Poland; Taiwan; United Kingdom; United States of America). All twelve studies that met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were assessed to be of high methodological quality and had addressed potential bias in design, conduct and analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid extensive implementation of online antenatal education during COVID‐19 has challenged maternity care providers to critically reconsider the inherent delivery of antenatal education (Wright et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020). Women access information through varied electronic and non‐electronic means (Wright et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All businesses sold Antenatal Education, with some selling further services such as midwifery care or a book. Although a survey in Australia found that women still prefer face to face antenatal education provision, 77% of women turned to their smartphone via Apps and the internet for antenatal education (52). An absence of guidance around social media at national level has enabled midwives to take this as an opportunity to create their own enterprises.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%