2021
DOI: 10.3390/bios11040110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paper-Based Biosensors: Frontiers in Point-of-Care Detection of COVID-19 Disease

Abstract: This review summarizes the state of the art of paper-based biosensors (PBBs) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) detection. Three categories of PBB are currently being been used for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnostics, namely for viral gene, viral antigen and antibody detection. The characteristics, the analytical performance, the advantages and drawbacks of each type of biosensor are highlighted and compared with traditional methods. It is hoped that this review will b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also due to the fact that in contrast to other promising paper-based analytical platforms that mainly remain as laboratory prototypes, LFIA devices easily enter into real-life applications with a high market penetration mainly because they do not need extensive upgrades to become an end-user device [ 18 ]. The wide acceptance of LFIA devices also played an eminent role in the use of the platform for the detection of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), in the current pandemic situation, as we can still notice and as extensively reported in the literature [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also due to the fact that in contrast to other promising paper-based analytical platforms that mainly remain as laboratory prototypes, LFIA devices easily enter into real-life applications with a high market penetration mainly because they do not need extensive upgrades to become an end-user device [ 18 ]. The wide acceptance of LFIA devices also played an eminent role in the use of the platform for the detection of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), in the current pandemic situation, as we can still notice and as extensively reported in the literature [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Disclaimer: the cost analysis approximates the cost for the materials and reagents required to make one testing device based on a mix of reported material costs and independent research into the materials used [ 12 , 98 , 99 , 100 ]. …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of several recent advancements in SARS-CoV-2 detection methods and their future on-site diagnostic potential for SARS-CoV-2. : the cost analysis approximates the cost for the materials and reagents required to make one testing device based on a mix of reported material costs and independent research into the materials used[12,[98][99][100].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fabrication of microchannels or patterns on the substrates of lab-on-paper devices is mainly performed by filling the holes in the paper base with hydrophobic materials to form microchannels and impermeable barriers, or by cutting. The patterning process can be performed using many different methods, including laser printing, inkjet printing, plotting, wax printing, process cutting, flexographic printing, wet etching, laser cutting, screen printing, photolithography, chemical vapor deposition, knife drawing, spray coating, plasma treatment, sol-gel, handheld corona treatment, imprinting, 3D printing, embossing, and so on [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Each method has its own specific merits and drawbacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%