2018
DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20181840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Papel da ultrassonografia endoscópica na avaliação da fístula perianal na doença de Crohn.

Abstract: RESUMO Objetivo: determinar o papel da ultrassonografia endoscópica (UE) em relação à ressonância magnética nuclear (RMN) e ao exame sob anestesia (ESA) no manejo de pacientes com doença de Crohn fistulizante perianal. Métodos: estudo observacional transversal com pacientes com doença de Crohn perianal, avaliados em um centro terciário de Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil, de fevereiro de 2016 a março de 2017. Todos os pacientes foram submetidos à UE, RMN e ESA. O grau de concordância entre os três métodos foi avalia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also has the advantage of assessing the macroscopic aspect of the recto-colonic mucosa and the ability to identify the internal orifice of the fistulous tract. EUS has limitations in identifying supra sphincteric and posteriorly located fistulous trajectories, while MRI has difficulty evaluating short, superficial, anteriorly located or anovaginal trajectories 39 . A study that compared the effectiveness of three methods (examination under anesthesia, MRI and EUS) for the evaluation of perianal CD patients included 34 patients (40 fistulas and 13 abscesses) and found no significant differences between the three methods.…”
Section: Perianal/rectal Endsoscopic Point Of Care Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also has the advantage of assessing the macroscopic aspect of the recto-colonic mucosa and the ability to identify the internal orifice of the fistulous tract. EUS has limitations in identifying supra sphincteric and posteriorly located fistulous trajectories, while MRI has difficulty evaluating short, superficial, anteriorly located or anovaginal trajectories 39 . A study that compared the effectiveness of three methods (examination under anesthesia, MRI and EUS) for the evaluation of perianal CD patients included 34 patients (40 fistulas and 13 abscesses) and found no significant differences between the three methods.…”
Section: Perianal/rectal Endsoscopic Point Of Care Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It plays an important role in limiting. Additionally, MRI images can be used to define the anatomic relationship of the perianal fistula and forecast the likelihood of postoperative faecal incontinence (Amato et al, 2020;Criado et al, 2018;Molteni et al, 2018;Shahzad et al, 2021;Sharma et al, 2020;Westbrook & Talbot, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%