2018
DOI: 10.1111/tme.12508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Papain‐treated panels are a simple method for the identification of alloantibodies in multiple myeloma patients treated with anti‐CD38‐based therapies

Abstract: Anti-CD38 MAs produce nonspecific interference in blood bank tests. This interference can be overcome by various methods, including DTT or papain treatment as proposed here. These methods have limitations that can be resolved using phenotyped blood units.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies in the available literature report favourable outcomes to transfusion in this cohort of patients where ABO/RH/K matched or extended phenotype matched units have been given, with very few transfusion reactions reported and instances of alloimmunisation reported to be low, once daratumumab therapy has commenced. Published rates of alloimmunisation are between 0% and 3% in this cohort of patients [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] (see Table I) and studies report a variety of transfusion approaches, including providing RBCs matched for ABO/Rh/K antigens, which is congruent with current BSH guidance, or routine provision of extended matched RBCs to this cohort of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies in the available literature report favourable outcomes to transfusion in this cohort of patients where ABO/RH/K matched or extended phenotype matched units have been given, with very few transfusion reactions reported and instances of alloimmunisation reported to be low, once daratumumab therapy has commenced. Published rates of alloimmunisation are between 0% and 3% in this cohort of patients [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] (see Table I) and studies report a variety of transfusion approaches, including providing RBCs matched for ABO/Rh/K antigens, which is congruent with current BSH guidance, or routine provision of extended matched RBCs to this cohort of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This is concordant with other, much smaller cohort group studies. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] The overall rate of alloimmunisation in the cohort, defined as the presence of an antibody to a RBC antigen, either existing or newly-formed once daratumumab therapy had begun, was 4%…”
Section: Conclusion/discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods have been developed to negate DARA interference including destruction of CD38 on reagent RBC by dithiothreitol (DTT) or proteolytic enzymes such as trypsin and papain ; masking CD38 with F(ab')2 fragments of DARA ; using CD38‐negative reagent RBC such as cord RBC ; and neutralizing DARA in patient plasma with anti‐DARA idiotype antibody or recombinant human soluble CD38 . DTT denaturation of CD38 on reagent RBC by disruption of disulphide bonds in its extracellular domain is the most widely adopted method to negate DARA interference worldwide .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six of 43 (14.0%) patients had a positive autocontrol IAT, and 13/67 (19.4%) had positive DAT. One study performed long-term follow-up DAT on three patients who previously had a positive result, and all became negative ( 17 ). Three studies reported on time to resolution of positive IAT after cessation of therapy; the durations were 2–6 months (range), median 5 months (range 1–9 months), and median 3.4 months (range 2.1–6.3) ( 7 , 15 , 17 ).…”
Section: Clinical Data On Impact Of Anti-cd38 Antibodies On Blood Typmentioning
confidence: 99%