2016
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Papain‐like cysteine proteases as hubs in plant immunity

Abstract: 902I.902II.903III.903IV.903V.905VI.905VII.905906References906 Summary Plants deploy a sophisticated immune system to cope with different microbial pathogens and other invaders. Recent research provides an increasing body of evidence for papain‐like cysteine proteases (PLCPs) being central hubs in plant immunity. PLCPs are required for full resistance of plants to various pathogens. At the same time, PLCPs are targeted by secreted pathogen effectors to suppress immune responses. Consequently, they are subject… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
143
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(77 reference statements)
3
143
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…() who showed that A. thaliana mutants lacking the PLCPs PAP1, PAP4, and PAP, and in particular RD21A, were more susceptible to H. schachtii infection. Additionally, the critical roles in plant immunity played by the orthologous members of RD21A in various plant species such as C14 from tomato and N. benthamiana , and CP1 from corn have also been documented (Misas‐Villamil et al ., ). Therefore, we decided to examine this protein−protein interaction in detail.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…() who showed that A. thaliana mutants lacking the PLCPs PAP1, PAP4, and PAP, and in particular RD21A, were more susceptible to H. schachtii infection. Additionally, the critical roles in plant immunity played by the orthologous members of RD21A in various plant species such as C14 from tomato and N. benthamiana , and CP1 from corn have also been documented (Misas‐Villamil et al ., ). Therefore, we decided to examine this protein−protein interaction in detail.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The recognition of the L. maculans effectors AvrLm1 (Gout et al, 2006) and AvrLm2 (Ghanbarnia et al, 2015) by the R genes LepR3 (Larkan et al, 2013) and Rlm2 (Larkan et al, 2015), respectively, is known to involve at least two additional partner proteins in the membrane-bound signaling complex; SOBIR1 and BAK1 (Larkan et al, 2015; Ma and Borhan, 2015). Other host proteins may also be involved in the signaling complex, based on other plant interactions with apoplastic fungal pathogens (van der Hoorn and Kamoun, 2008; Stotz et al, 2014; Misas-Villamil et al, 2016). Subtle variation in either the expression or sequence of these partner proteins may account for the range of resistance responses observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the detected extracellular proteins is RD21, a secreted protease reported to be involved in Arabidopsis resistance to Botrytis cinerea infection but not bacterial pathogens (Shindo et al, 2012). Several pathogens secrete inhibitor proteins to counteract RD21-like activities, which indicates that such proteases play important roles in plant resistance (Zhang et al, 2014; Misas-Villamil et al, 2016). Thus, the detection of RD21 supports the idea of defense regulation through MPK3/6 by increasing release of antimicrobial proteins into the extracellular milieu.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%