2017
DOI: 10.1071/rd15261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Papain and its inhibitor E-64 reduce camelid semen viscosity without impairing sperm function and improve post-thaw motility rates

Abstract: In camelids, the development of assisted reproductive technologies is impaired by the viscous nature of the semen. The protease papain has shown promise in reducing viscosity, although its effect on sperm integrity is unknown. The present study determined the optimal papain concentration and exposure time to reduce seminal plasma viscosity and investigated the effect of papain and its inhibitor E-64 on sperm function and cryopreservation in alpacas. Papain (0.1 mg mL–1, 20 min, 37°C) eliminated alpaca semen vi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For a long time, this fact was associated with the particular rheological characteristics of their seminal plasma, such as a high structural viscosity (Casaretto et al, ). Treatment with different enzymes was used to reduce the effect of viscosity on sperm motility (collagenase and trypsin, Bravo et al, ; glycosaminoglycan and proteases: Kershaw‐Young, Stuart, Evans, & Maxwell, ; papain: Kershaw‐Young, Evans, Rodney, & Maxwell, ). Nevertheless, there is evidence that the effect of seminal plasma on sperm motility is not only limited by the physical limitation imposed by viscosity, but also by some chemical component (Carretero, Fumuso, Miragaya, Herrera, & Giuliano, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a long time, this fact was associated with the particular rheological characteristics of their seminal plasma, such as a high structural viscosity (Casaretto et al, ). Treatment with different enzymes was used to reduce the effect of viscosity on sperm motility (collagenase and trypsin, Bravo et al, ; glycosaminoglycan and proteases: Kershaw‐Young, Stuart, Evans, & Maxwell, ; papain: Kershaw‐Young, Evans, Rodney, & Maxwell, ). Nevertheless, there is evidence that the effect of seminal plasma on sperm motility is not only limited by the physical limitation imposed by viscosity, but also by some chemical component (Carretero, Fumuso, Miragaya, Herrera, & Giuliano, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some methods for semen evaluation based on flow cytometry cannot be applied in samples that contain SP. For all these reasons, high‐speed centrifugation of ejaculates and semen incubation with enzymes have been performed to separate spermatozoa from SP and to reduce thread formation, respectively (Bravo, Callo, & Garnica, 2000; Carretero et al., 2015; Fumuso et al., 2018; Giuliano et al., 2010; Kershaw, Evans, Rodney, & Maxwell, 2017; Kershaw‐Young & Maxwell, 2011; Morton, Gibb, Leahy, & Maxwell, 2012). However, these techniques could damage spermatozoa or modify their membrane composition, reducing their resistance to the cryopreservation process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most cooling and freezing techniques used so far in camelids have been adapted from those used in bulls and rams, and include diluting spermatozoa without removing seminal plasma (SP) before performing the freezing curves (Aller et al, ; Bravo, Skidmore et al, ; Carretero, Neild et al, ; Giuliano et al, ; Santiani et al, ; Vaughan ). Some reports mention difficulties in homogenising the diluted samples and in loading straws prior to freezing (Carretero, Neild et al, ), all probably due to the SAC semen rheological properties, such as thread formation and the high structural viscosity (Bravo, Callo, & Garnica, ; Giuliano et al, ; Kershaw, Evans, Rodney, & Maxwell, ). The low pregnancy rates in SACs obtained to date with frozen–thawed semen could partly be due to these rheological characteristics interfering with cryoprotectants reaching spermatozoa and preventing, or hampering, an efficient homogenisation of the ejaculate with the diluents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%