1968
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(68)90220-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Panoramic roentgenograms compared with conventional intraoral roentgenograms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Douglass et al reported that the mean positive and negative predictive values of periapical, bitewing and panoramic radiographs for the detection of dental caries in molar area were nearly identical 11. These results were in agreement with Oba and Katayama12 and Stewart and Bieser13…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Douglass et al reported that the mean positive and negative predictive values of periapical, bitewing and panoramic radiographs for the detection of dental caries in molar area were nearly identical 11. These results were in agreement with Oba and Katayama12 and Stewart and Bieser13…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Kidd and Pitts reviewed the literatures and concluded the use of bitewing radiography was essential if much approximal caries was not to be missed 7. For this reason, most of previous studies have compared the caries detection between panoramic and intraoral radiographs,7-13 and there were few studies comparing the panoramic radiography and clinical examination 2,14,15…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If necessary, periapical radiographs are preferred for these regions. A number of investigations have compared conventional intraoral radiography with PAN radiography for the diagnosis of caries (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). However, in this study, the ability of radiographic techniques to reveal both the presence and absence of caries was measured.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%