2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2004.00810.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Panoptic versus conventional ophthalmoscope

Abstract: Medical students found the PO much easier to use, with accuracy of rating the VCDR similar to the CO. This comparison would support the wider use of the PO amongst medical students, general practitioners and other primary care providers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…23 In most institutions this is likely to be a time-and labour-intensive intervention, requiring access to specialist photographic equipment. Other interventions such as pan-optic ophthalmoscopes 10 and smartphone adaptors 11 have been proposed, but these are not yet common among most frontline clinicians and their educational benefit is still yet to be explored. Presently, we describe a teaching intervention that demonstrates an improvement in both confidence and objective performance amongst medical students performing direct ophthalmoscopy when compared with controls in a randomised trial.…”
Section: Improving Student Competence and Confidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…23 In most institutions this is likely to be a time-and labour-intensive intervention, requiring access to specialist photographic equipment. Other interventions such as pan-optic ophthalmoscopes 10 and smartphone adaptors 11 have been proposed, but these are not yet common among most frontline clinicians and their educational benefit is still yet to be explored. Presently, we describe a teaching intervention that demonstrates an improvement in both confidence and objective performance amongst medical students performing direct ophthalmoscopy when compared with controls in a randomised trial.…”
Section: Improving Student Competence and Confidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, medical students, junior doctors, and general practitioners have consistently reported low levels of confidence in ophthalmoscopy. [4][5][6][7][8] Although some parties have suggested that direct ophthalmoscopy might be replaced by ocular fundus photographs, 3,9 pan-optic ophthalmoscopes 2,10 or by smartphone technology, 11 the reality is that the conventional handheld direct ophthalmoscope remains the most readily accessible tool for fundoscopy to the majority of frontline clinicians. It can be used to quickly and effectively detect a number of lifethreatening and disabling diseases and so remains a diagnostic tool with which all graduating doctors should be familiar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abordando de maneira mais direta, somente há o trabalho de Mc Comiskie et al em 2004 e outro trabalho de Gill et al também de 2004 como técnica de "screening" para detecção de retinopatia diabética (4,5) . Desde então, é pouco conhecida a diferença técnica entre os dois tipos de oftalmoscópios .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…6 The PanOptic Ophthalmoscope is easier to use than the direct ophthalmoscope. Our first experience with fundus photography was to secure a customized smartphone holder to use with the PanOptic, along with the Welch Allyn iExaminer Pro app.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%