Pandemic, politics and pandemonium: political capacity and Singapore’s response to the Covid-19 crisis

Abstract

Singapore's response to the Covid-19 pandemic has largely been seen as timely and effective, with border lock-downs and contact tracing efforts by city-state's policymakers serving to slow down the spread of the virus. Yet despite such efforts, there have been instances of panic and confusion among the Singaporean citizenry. These include "panic buying" of essential household items as well as the spread of fake news. In this article, I will discuss the Singapore government's efforts to address and minimize such behavior. I argue that the Singapore government's ability to maintain relative social stability is driven by its high level of political capacity. Two forms of political capacity are particularly relevant: coercive political capacity and legitimation capacity. In focusing on political capacity, this paper seeks to delineate the political systemic drivers of Singapore's efforts to manage the Covid-19 crisis.

Do smart cities perform better in governing the COVID-19 crisis? Empirical evidence from Indonesian cities

“…The balance between preventive and curative aspects and the adjustment to the contextual socio-political precondition are worth considering by policy makers. The experience of Singapore's hybridity of hard and soft policy measures ( Woo, 2021 ) and South Korea's agility ( Moon, 2020 ) exemplifies the success narrative of implementing the policy mix. The case of Indonesian cities facing the pandemic is at the same vein as the analysis by Nohrstedt et al (2022) analysis that reports the tendency of cities to slowly adapt when they face external shocks.…”

“…The efficacy claim has also been used in the case of Singapore. Slightly different from South Korea, the Singaporean national government exploited its coercive political capacity and legitimacy ( Woo, 2021 ). Using a hybrid of hard and soft policy measures, Singapore maintained social stability while adopting stringent public health measures that minimized fatalities during the pandemic ( Das & Zhang, 2021 ).…”

Testing the relationship between democratic accountability and the approved use of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines: Evidence from 194 countries

“…The Singaporean government has effectively kept coronavirus outbreaks and their impacts at bay. This, in turn, has allowed the government to gain a high level of trust and legitimacy (Woo, 2020(Woo, , 2021.…”

Isolation facilities for covid-19: towards a person centred approach

“…Although this is a generalisation, the public’s view of this approach might reflect the role of the state in recent decades and the track record of responding to past health emergencies in East Asia. Singapore’s successful management of the 2003 SARS outbreak, for example, fostered trust in the government that mobilised collective action and compliance with public health measures during the covid-19 pandemic 5253. Other factors, such as high levels of social support including commensurate and accessible financial packages for those in isolation, might also influence the acceptability of isolation facilities 48…”