2021
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4572994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas 1.2.3

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data analysis was completed using Pandas (Reback et al, 2021), PM4Py (Berti et al, 2019) and scikit-learn (Pedregosa et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data analysis was completed using Pandas (Reback et al, 2021), PM4Py (Berti et al, 2019) and scikit-learn (Pedregosa et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of analyses were conducted using Python 3.8.10 (Van Rossum & Drake, 2009) and the following packages: Scikit-learn 0.21.1 (Pedregosa et al, 2011), pandas 1.2.3 (Reback et al, 2021), NumPy 1.19.5 (Harris et al, 2020), and sciPy 1.6.0 (Virtanen et al, 2020). Differential prediction standardized effect sizes were calculated in R 3.6.0 (R Core Team, 2022) using the psychmeta package (Dahlke & Wiernik, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Scopus search, it was performed using the same keyword. Both results were visualized together using Bokeh and NumPy libraries in Python. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%