2020
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4019559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas 1.1.2

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…R [68] and R packages tidyverse, ggpubr, ggdendro, seqinr, Biostrings, msa, reshape2, UpSetR, cluster, ade4, RColorBrewer, readxl, dplyr, and ggdendro were used for analysis or visualization [69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80]. Python 3.6.4, pandas [81], and CobraPy 0.14.1 [55], as well as code to implement Diamond-based annotation scoring from CarveMe [52], were used for the reconstruction and modeling. Memote [62] was used to evaluate all reconstructions.…”
Section: Author Summary Additional Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R [68] and R packages tidyverse, ggpubr, ggdendro, seqinr, Biostrings, msa, reshape2, UpSetR, cluster, ade4, RColorBrewer, readxl, dplyr, and ggdendro were used for analysis or visualization [69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80]. Python 3.6.4, pandas [81], and CobraPy 0.14.1 [55], as well as code to implement Diamond-based annotation scoring from CarveMe [52], were used for the reconstruction and modeling. Memote [62] was used to evaluate all reconstructions.…”
Section: Author Summary Additional Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All analyses were performed using the Python programming language [version 3.9.12; ( 22 )]. The open-source Python libraries Pandas [version 1.4.2; ( 23 )], NumPy [version 1.22.3; ( 24 , 25 )], Scikitlearn [version 1.0.2; ( 26 )], Matplotlib [version 3.5.1; ( 27 )], and SciPy [version 1.8.0; ( 28 )] were also used. Student’s t -tests were performed with SciPy’s ttest_ind function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KO annotation results were aggregated and analyzed using KEGG-Decoder v1.2.2 which assesses percent completeness of metabolic pathways defined by KEGG ( Graham et al, 2018 ). A heatmap of the results was produced using a custom python v3.7.8 ( McKinney, 2010 ; Reback et al, 2020 ; Waskom, 2021 ) script available at https://github.com/zscooper/marinobacter_pangenomics .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HGTector2 output was combined with NCBI COG ( Galperin et al, 2019 ) annotations for each gene call assigned during pangenome assembly. Genes that were not annotated with COGs but scored as putative horizontally transferred genes were counted as “None.” The output data were analyzed and visualized using custom python v3.7.8 ( McKinney, 2010 ; Reback et al, 2020 ; Waskom, 2021 ) scripts available at https://github.com/zscooper/marinobacter_pangenomics .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%