2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-013-2984-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pancreatic safety of GLP-1-based therapeutic agents: further insights from rodent studies?

Abstract: Abbreviations DPP-4 Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 GLP-1 Glucagon-like peptide-1In this issue of Diabetologia, Ellenbroek and colleagues present a study of the effects of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, liraglutide, on beta cell function and mass in normoglycaemic mice [1]. The mice were treated with liraglutide at 0.1 mg/kg twice daily (a high but reasonable dose) for either 1 or 6 weeks while they received either a control diet or a high fat diet. Compared with controls, liraglutide improved in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we would like to stress that it is important to investigate in depth any indication that incretin treatment may lead to inflammation or dysplasia in the pancreas, we find that the data presented in this paper have serious methodological deficiencies that preclude any meaningful conclusions. Others have already raised some of the issues: some inherent in a human postmortem study (small number of cases; lack of detailed premortem history), others specific to this study, including the heterogeneity in subject age, and differences in the incretin drugs used, dosage employed and duration of diabetes. Harja et al in re‐examining the clinical information of the cases in the nPOD database detailed even more differences between the study groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we would like to stress that it is important to investigate in depth any indication that incretin treatment may lead to inflammation or dysplasia in the pancreas, we find that the data presented in this paper have serious methodological deficiencies that preclude any meaningful conclusions. Others have already raised some of the issues: some inherent in a human postmortem study (small number of cases; lack of detailed premortem history), others specific to this study, including the heterogeneity in subject age, and differences in the incretin drugs used, dosage employed and duration of diabetes. Harja et al in re‐examining the clinical information of the cases in the nPOD database detailed even more differences between the study groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and their interpretation (reason for a serious change in the risk-benefit assessment for GLP-1 receptor agonists and/or DPP-4 inhibitors?) have raised a highly controversial debate, with letters-to-the editor [4][5][6] from pharmaceutical companies marketing incretin-based drugs or commentaries from the academic world in the journal originally publishing the latest results, Diabetes 7,8 as well as in other journals, 9,10 indicating that widely contrasting views have been held on the issues raised by Butler et al's article. 3 Journalists have adopted the position that long-term consequences of using incretin-based drugs may include pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, and that hints from relevant studies have not been made public in due time to protect financial interests related to drug sales.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%