2006
DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.0000197033.54756.83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pancreatic Polypeptide-Fold Peptide Receptors and Angiotensin II–Induced Renal Vasoconstriction

Abstract: Abstract-TheKey Words: receptors Ⅲ neuropeptides Ⅲ peptides Ⅲ hypertension T he renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is essential for the development and maintenance of genetic hypertension in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). 1,2 Moreover, transplantation studies reveal that, in addition to the RAS, the SHR kidney is pivotal to the pathophysiology of hypertension in the SHR. 3,4 Finally, the renal sympathetic nervous system also appears to importantly contribute to the pathophysiology of hypertension in SHRs.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since both NE and angiotensin II signal via Gq-coupled receptors [␣ 1 -adrenoceptors (9) and angiotensin II AT 1 receptors (44), respectively], the A 1 receptor would also likely enhance NEinduced renal vasoconstriction. Also, A 1 receptors are Gicoupled receptors (49), and studies by our lab demonstrate coincident signaling between Gq-coupled receptors (for example, AT 1 receptors and vasopressinV 1 receptors) and Gi-coupled receptors (for example, Y 1 receptors and ␣ 2 -adrenoceptors) in the renal microcirculation resulting in potentiation of Gq-induced renal vasoconstriction by the Gi signal transduction pathway (10,11,17). Thus, taken together, this line of reasoning would predict coincident signaling in the renal microcirculation between released adenosine, via A 1 receptorinduced activation of Gi, and released NE, via ␣ 1 -adrenoceptorinduced activation of Gq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Since both NE and angiotensin II signal via Gq-coupled receptors [␣ 1 -adrenoceptors (9) and angiotensin II AT 1 receptors (44), respectively], the A 1 receptor would also likely enhance NEinduced renal vasoconstriction. Also, A 1 receptors are Gicoupled receptors (49), and studies by our lab demonstrate coincident signaling between Gq-coupled receptors (for example, AT 1 receptors and vasopressinV 1 receptors) and Gi-coupled receptors (for example, Y 1 receptors and ␣ 2 -adrenoceptors) in the renal microcirculation resulting in potentiation of Gq-induced renal vasoconstriction by the Gi signal transduction pathway (10,11,17). Thus, taken together, this line of reasoning would predict coincident signaling in the renal microcirculation between released adenosine, via A 1 receptorinduced activation of Gi, and released NE, via ␣ 1 -adrenoceptorinduced activation of Gq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…1 In contrast, kidneys from normotensive WistarKyoto rats (WKY) are resistant to this interaction. 1 Our studies also show that unlike Y 1 Rs, renovascular Y 2 receptors (Y 2 Rs) exert little effect on Ang II-induced renovascular responses in kidneys from either SHR or WKY.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In contrast, kidneys from normotensive WistarKyoto rats (WKY) are resistant to this interaction. 1 Our studies also show that unlike Y 1 Rs, renovascular Y 2 receptors (Y 2 Rs) exert little effect on Ang II-induced renovascular responses in kidneys from either SHR or WKY. 1 Although we do not know precisely why SHR, but not WKY, kidneys are susceptible to Y 1 R-induced enhancement of Ang IImediated renal vasoconstriction, these findings indicate that endogenous agonists of Y 1 Rs, but not Y 2 Rs, would potentiate Ang II-induced renal vasoconstriction in geneticallysusceptible kidneys, provided Y 1 R agonists reach the renal microcirculation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our previously published work demonstrates that Y 1 receptor expression is not different in preglomerular microvessels from SHR vs. WKY (15), so receptor expression differences are unlikely to account for the differential proliferative responses of SHR vs. WKY to NPY and PYY . On the other hand, our previously published work does show that signaling via G i -linked receptors is enhanced in the renal vasculature of SHR vs. WKY (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%