1969
DOI: 10.2337/diab.18.5.268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pancreatic Insulin Content of Nonpregnant, Pregnant and Postpartum Rats and the Developing Rat Fetus

Abstract: A study was made of the insulin content of pancreases of nonpregnant, pregnant and postpartum rats and of their developing fetuses. The insulin content of the extracts was measured by radioimmunoassay, using crystalline rat insulin as a standard. The mean concentration of insulin in the pancreas of nonpregnant animals was 43 ± 6 μg./gm. The insulin concentration did not change significantly during late pregnancy or on day 4 postpartum. However, the weight of the pancreas was significantly greater in the pregna… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
8
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This discrepancy in the two assays is probably related to the heterogeneity in the sample and standard. For example, the assay levels of Clark and Rutter (6) in the late embryonic pancreas agree well with earlier studies using beef insulin standards (20), whereas the insulin content of the late embryonic pancreas found in the present study agrees with those using homologous rat insulin as a standard (21,22 (20), using a less sensitive immunoassay, measured insulin levels during the late embryonic stages and by a linear extrapolation predicted the initiation of insulin synthesis between days 16 and 17. Grillo (23), in contrast, using an immunofluorescence method, reported the presence of insulin earlier in development, just at the beginning of the dramatic increase in specific activity.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This discrepancy in the two assays is probably related to the heterogeneity in the sample and standard. For example, the assay levels of Clark and Rutter (6) in the late embryonic pancreas agree well with earlier studies using beef insulin standards (20), whereas the insulin content of the late embryonic pancreas found in the present study agrees with those using homologous rat insulin as a standard (21,22 (20), using a less sensitive immunoassay, measured insulin levels during the late embryonic stages and by a linear extrapolation predicted the initiation of insulin synthesis between days 16 and 17. Grillo (23), in contrast, using an immunofluorescence method, reported the presence of insulin earlier in development, just at the beginning of the dramatic increase in specific activity.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the current procedure, dilutions of reagents, standards, and samples are made with 0.5% crystalline bovine-serum albumin (Miles Laboratories) in 0.05 M phosphate (pH 7.0). The assay is carried out in three successive stages on each sample: I (40, [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Ag per assay tube produced a low, yet significant, displacement of labeled hormone (insulin or glucagon). However, the lowest specific activities of glucagon determined required no more than 20 ug of total pancreatic protein; the lowest levels of insulin determined required less than 10 ug of total protein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pancreatic insulin level was highest in 10-day-old control rats and decreased to adult levels between 15 and 25 days of age. A high insulin concentration in the pancreas of neonatal rats has been re ported by others [24], Previously published data indicate that the high pancreatic insulin the second dose ( fig. 1).…”
Section: Age-related Differences In the Susceptiblity Of Endocrine Pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insulin was extracted from the fetal pancreas by acid-ethanol [7] and estimated as described previously [8], Rat insulin (supplied by Dr. M. Root, Eli Lilly Co.. Indianapolis, Ind., USA) was used as standard and the data expressed as microunits insulin per milligram wet weight of the pancreas. All data were calculated as mean values ± SEM and analyzed for statistical dif ference by Anova.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%