2007
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pancreatic insufficiency after different resections for benign tumours

Abstract: Different pancreatic resections are associated with different risks of developing long-term pancreatic insufficiency. AR represents the best option in terms of long-term endocrine and exocrine function, although it is associated with more postoperative complications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
144
1
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
10
144
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[41][42][43] Because the probability of malignancy is very low in patients with small MCNs without nodules, lymphadenectomy can be avoided and parenchyma-sparing procedures such as middle pancreatectomy 44 and perhaps enucleations 45,46 should be performed more often, because they decrease the rate of postoperative pancreatic insufficiency and they have been proven to be safe in the treatment of well-selected patients with MCNs. 44,47 If tumors are removed when they are smaller, the expected loss of pancreatic parenchyma should be low, thus decreasing the probability of developing endocrine and exocrine insufficiency during follow-up. 47 When these operations are not feasible because of tumor location and/or size, spleenpreserving or limited DP is a valid alternative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[41][42][43] Because the probability of malignancy is very low in patients with small MCNs without nodules, lymphadenectomy can be avoided and parenchyma-sparing procedures such as middle pancreatectomy 44 and perhaps enucleations 45,46 should be performed more often, because they decrease the rate of postoperative pancreatic insufficiency and they have been proven to be safe in the treatment of well-selected patients with MCNs. 44,47 If tumors are removed when they are smaller, the expected loss of pancreatic parenchyma should be low, thus decreasing the probability of developing endocrine and exocrine insufficiency during follow-up. 47 When these operations are not feasible because of tumor location and/or size, spleenpreserving or limited DP is a valid alternative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44,47 If tumors are removed when they are smaller, the expected loss of pancreatic parenchyma should be low, thus decreasing the probability of developing endocrine and exocrine insufficiency during follow-up. 47 When these operations are not feasible because of tumor location and/or size, spleenpreserving or limited DP is a valid alternative. 48,49 In small neoplasms (<5 cm) a minimally invasive approach should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, when performed in high-volume centers, pancreatic typical resections have an acceptable mortality rate (!5%), although the percentage of complications is still significant ranging from 40 to 50% (14,15). Typical pancreatic resections are also associated with a high incidence of exocrine and endocrine insufficiency (16). Risk of longterm pancreatic impairment has increased the use of parenchyma-sparing techniques or atypical resections such as enucleation and middle pancreatectomy that consists of the resection of the central part of the gland.…”
Section: Management Of Localized Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, pancreatic resection, even for benign disease, is still associated with very high morbidity and long-term endocrine and exocrine insufficiency risks [21] . This mortality, even reduced to its minimum rate, should be considered very poor for such a benign lesion.…”
Section: Long-term Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%