1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1999.tb01469.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pancreatic Edema in Dogs with Hypoalbuminemia or Portal Hypertension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) Changes limited only to distension of the bowel segments with fluid. Pancreatic edema was defined as the presence of anechoic fissures within the pancreas 22 . Dogs in the food‐responsive disease group did not have secondary abnormalities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Changes limited only to distension of the bowel segments with fluid. Pancreatic edema was defined as the presence of anechoic fissures within the pancreas 22 . Dogs in the food‐responsive disease group did not have secondary abnormalities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…83,84 The venous drainage of the pancreas, gallbladder, and stomach communicates with the portal system only, with no possible communication with the systemic venous circulation and this anatomical characteristic causes the pancreas, gallbladder, and stomach to develop marked edema in case of portal hypertension. 21,85,86 With ultrasound, multiple hypoechoic septi ("tiger stripes appearance") are observed in the pancreas of patients with portal hypertension representing edema of the connective tissue between the pancreatic lobules. 21,86 Marked thickening of the gallbladder with an internal hypoechoic layer and a more external hyperechoic layer ("double wall appearance") has been reported in case of gallbladder wall edema (portal hypertension, cholecystitis).…”
Section: Organ Venous Congestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although unlikely to cause clinical confusion with pancreatitis, pancreatic enlargement is not sufficient as a sole finding to diagnose pancreatitis. 33 Sonographic findings should always be interpreted in light of the full clinical picture, and normal findings certainly do not rule out pancreatitis.…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%