2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.08.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pancreas Preservation With the University of Wisconsin Versus Celsior Solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two retrospective studies contrast these reports. In line with this study Manrique et al [47] shows similar 2-year graft and patient survival for University of Wisconsin and Celsior perfused/preserved pancreases. There is, however, consensus regarding equal results using University of Wisconsin or HTK if CIT is less than 12 h. Even though high-volume flush of HTK is recommended by the manufacturer, results of these studies suggest a higher incidence of graft pancreatitis, if the HTK volume exceeds 5 l. Less common is the use of Celsior.…”
Section: Retrieval Techniquesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Two retrospective studies contrast these reports. In line with this study Manrique et al [47] shows similar 2-year graft and patient survival for University of Wisconsin and Celsior perfused/preserved pancreases. There is, however, consensus regarding equal results using University of Wisconsin or HTK if CIT is less than 12 h. Even though high-volume flush of HTK is recommended by the manufacturer, results of these studies suggest a higher incidence of graft pancreatitis, if the HTK volume exceeds 5 l. Less common is the use of Celsior.…”
Section: Retrieval Techniquesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The authors demonstrated that Celsior and UWS had similar safety profiles for pancreas preservation. Another study reported by Manrique et al [35•] comparing Celsior ( n = 28) with UWS ( n = 44) for pancreas preservation demonstrated that 2-year recipient survival rates, 2-year graft survival rates, pancreas leakage rates, and clinical graft pancreatitis rates were similar in both groups.…”
Section: Pancreas Preservation For Pancreas Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The two main methods used for experimental and clinical organ preservation are static cold storage, which we will simply refer to as cold storage, and machine perfusion [1020,21•,22•,2334,35•,36,37•,3844]. The hypothermic pulsatile machine perfusion technique originally developed by Carrel and Lindbergh in 1935 [45–47] has been widely used for clinical kidney transplants [48] but not for clinical pancreas preservation.…”
Section: Pancreas Preservation For Pancreas Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, none of these guidelines preclude dual perfusion when the pancreas is being retrieved, although German standards stipulate portal venous perfusion via a catheter inserted directly into the portal vein above the pancreas/duodenum [45,60,74,75]. The use of Celsior or IGL-1 solution has not yet been incorporated into major National or Regional guidelines, although both have been employed in the clinical context [64,65,72,76].…”
Section: Perfusion Fluid Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%