2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2008.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palmprint recognition using Gabor-based local invariant features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of samples is different in each experiment. The proposed hierarchical recognition method compares with those currently usually used recognition methods such as Gabor, [9] statistical method. [10] The experimental results show that the average correct recognition rates of these methods are 96.82%, 89.93%, 85.98% in simulation of 300 times, respectively.…”
Section: Experiments and Results Analysis (1) Establish A Standard Temmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of samples is different in each experiment. The proposed hierarchical recognition method compares with those currently usually used recognition methods such as Gabor, [9] statistical method. [10] The experimental results show that the average correct recognition rates of these methods are 96.82%, 89.93%, 85.98% in simulation of 300 times, respectively.…”
Section: Experiments and Results Analysis (1) Establish A Standard Temmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed hierarchical recognition method and the usual used recognition methods [9,10] are compared from two aspects that are the computing speed and the correct recognition rate. Table 3 gives the results of a comprehensive comparison.…”
Section: Experiments and Results Analysis (1) Establish A Standard Temmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature [11] provided an updated survey of palmprint recognition methods, and presented a comparative study to evaluate the performance of the state-of-the-art palmprint recognition methods. According to [11], the proposed classification approach compares with those currently usually used approaches such as FCM [6], Median filter [9], Gabor [12] and Fourier transform [13]. The experimental results show that the average correct classification rates of these approaches are 95.57%, 94.11%, 93.24%, 92.45% and 88.17% in simulation of 500 times, respectively.…”
Section: Experiments and Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Statistical approaches transform an input image into another domain and divide the transformed image into small regions. Then statistical features are extracted from each small region [13,14]. According to the results of these studies, line-based approaches are deemed to produce the most promising results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%