1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf02442251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palmar pattern frequencies as indicators of relationships among Sardinian linguistic groups of males

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the relationships among males of Sardinian linguistic groups shown by qualitative and quantitative palmar dermatoglyphic traits (Sanna, 1985(Sanna, , 1986Floris & Sanna, 1987;Sanna & Floris, 1995; are different from those found in this study. Nevertheless, the relationships among males of Sardinian linguistic groups shown by qualitative and quantitative palmar dermatoglyphic traits (Sanna, 1985(Sanna, , 1986Floris & Sanna, 1987;Sanna & Floris, 1995; are different from those found in this study.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the relationships among males of Sardinian linguistic groups shown by qualitative and quantitative palmar dermatoglyphic traits (Sanna, 1985(Sanna, , 1986Floris & Sanna, 1987;Sanna & Floris, 1995; are different from those found in this study. Nevertheless, the relationships among males of Sardinian linguistic groups shown by qualitative and quantitative palmar dermatoglyphic traits (Sanna, 1985(Sanna, , 1986Floris & Sanna, 1987;Sanna & Floris, 1995; are different from those found in this study.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…Brief notes on the historical-linguistic backgrounds of the groups under study are included in previous studies in which we used dermatoglyphic traits as indicators of biological relationships among Sardinian linguistic groups (Sanna & Floris, 1995;Sanna et al, , 2000.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al., 1974;Friedlaender, 1975;Rudan, 1978;Rothhammer et al, 1979;Jantz and Chopra, 1983;Karmakar, 1984;Reddy et. On the other hand some earlier studies suggested that dermatoglyphic traits are more advantageous polygenic marker for tracing the affinities between group.s (Rife, 1954;Froehlich and Giles, 1981;Micle and Kobyliansky, 1986) and provides greater agreement with the ethnic histories as well as geographic background (Reddy and Reddy, 1992;Sanna and Floris, 1995;Floris et al, 1998) of different groups than serological or anthropometric traits. Though quite a few others did find close congruence between delanatoglyphics and other biological data (Rothhammer et al, 1977;Malhotra, 1978;Jantzs et al, 1982;Crawford and Duggirala, 1992).…”
Section: Comparison Between Anthropometric and Dermatoglyphic Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The names of the Sardinian linguistic groups considered in this study and their sample sizes are given in Table 1. Information about the historical-linguistic background of the Sardinian linguistic groups considered in this study can be found in previous papers (Sanna, 1985(Sanna, , 1986Sanna & Floris, 1995;Sanna et al, 2000Sanna et al, , 2001. Information about the historical-linguistic background of the Sardinian linguistic groups considered in this study can be found in previous papers (Sanna, 1985(Sanna, , 1986Sanna & Floris, 1995;Sanna et al, 2000Sanna et al, , 2001.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%