2007
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2006.9988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palliative Care and Hospice in Advanced Heart Failure

Abstract: This paper provides an evidence-based review of the principles underlying palliative care for heart failure (HF), including its pathogenesis, staging, assessment, prognosis, and treatment. Approaches to advanced care planning, symptom management, hospice eligibility, home inotropic infusions, device management and improving the continuum of care in HF are discussed. The reader will be able to recognize advanced HF, use important elements of physical assessment, utilize Web-based prognostic and risk-stratificat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
1
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We can also be reassured by the increasing numbers of people with cancer who have been able to deal with bad news successfully and continue to lead fulfilling lives amidst uncertainty [42]. Perhaps, what is more important for clinicians to consider in the heart failure trajectory, is that the 'difficult conversation' is not a single discussion; rather, providing bad news, discussing prognosis and presenting treatment options are generally interrelated processes and should be undertaken in a series of ongoing conversations [32]. All issues may need to be discussed to a greater or lesser extent, from the initial diagnosis, when bad news is broken, through to later consultations when more information is available about treatment options [43].…”
Section: A Question Of Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can also be reassured by the increasing numbers of people with cancer who have been able to deal with bad news successfully and continue to lead fulfilling lives amidst uncertainty [42]. Perhaps, what is more important for clinicians to consider in the heart failure trajectory, is that the 'difficult conversation' is not a single discussion; rather, providing bad news, discussing prognosis and presenting treatment options are generally interrelated processes and should be undertaken in a series of ongoing conversations [32]. All issues may need to be discussed to a greater or lesser extent, from the initial diagnosis, when bad news is broken, through to later consultations when more information is available about treatment options [43].…”
Section: A Question Of Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,17 For patients with intractable signs and symptoms, a heart transplant, the reference standard for cardiac replacement, 18,19 is the only established surgical approach. 13 In the United States, however, the number of patients awaiting heart transplantation is much greater than the number of available donors.…”
Section: Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale for this decision is that discussing the patient's preferences for care needs to occur directly with the patient; therefore, this discussion must take place early enough in the disease trajectory for the patient to be an active participant in the discussion. 32 Future research is planned to determine if implementing this tool in the acute-care setting helps heighten awareness about the progressive nature of HF and increases appropriate EOL care planning for this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%