2017
DOI: 10.1177/1457496917731192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palliation of Malignant Biliary Obstruction: Adverse Events are Common after Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage

Abstract: Inclusion criteria were fulfilled in 140 patients. Median age was 70 years (33-91 years). Some 126 patients had a remaining external percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Jaundice was the initial symptom in 62 patients (44%). Within the first week after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, the bilirubin decreased from 237 µmol/L (31-634) to 180 µmol/L (17-545). Only 25% reached a level below the double upper reference value. Pruritus occurred in 27% before the percutaneous transhepatic biliary dra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially the discomfort and risks of an external PTC-drain should not be underestimated. [3,16,[35][36][37] The optimal drainage modality for mCRC patients cannot be determined with the available data, due to the lack of large observational studies and randomised clinical trials. For malignant biliary obstruction in general, ERCP is recommended for extrahepatic strictures and Bismuth type I and II strictures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially the discomfort and risks of an external PTC-drain should not be underestimated. [3,16,[35][36][37] The optimal drainage modality for mCRC patients cannot be determined with the available data, due to the lack of large observational studies and randomised clinical trials. For malignant biliary obstruction in general, ERCP is recommended for extrahepatic strictures and Bismuth type I and II strictures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percutaneous drainage has been found to have similar effectiveness without significant differences in survival time or cost compared to endoscopic biliary drainage . However, percutaneous drainage requires an external outlet for biliary drainage, which creates additional potential complications including pain and discomfort at the abdominal wall, leakage and dislocation of percutaneous tubing, bleeding, and risk of cellulitis . Due to these disadvantages associated with percutaneous drainage, ERCP is recommended as the initial strategy for biliary drainage in MBTO with percutaneous intervention reserved as a secondary option if endoscopic drainage is unsuccessful.…”
Section: Why Endoscopic Drainage Is the Preferred Modality Of Biliarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other way, in cases that the unresectable condition is diagnosed by imagining or laparoscopy, the endoscopic placement of a biliary stent is preferred. In most cases, the palliation of jaundice is obtained by an endoscopic approach [23,24]. The most common relapse pattern is represented by local recurrence.…”
Section: Prognostic Factors: Operability Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%