2021
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013757.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palivizumab for preventing severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
1
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, the only pharmaceutical agent available to prevent severe RSV infection in children is the RSV-specific monoclonal antibody palivizumab [ 20 , 53 – 55 ]. Compared with placebo or no intervention, palivizumab has been shown to reduce RSV hospitalisation in high-risk infants in randomised trials, with a review of five trials reporting a risk ratio (RR) of 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30–0.64) for such hospitalisations at 2-years’ follow up, although with little to no impact on mortality (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.42–1.15) [ 56 , 57 ]. However, palivizumab has not been studied in healthy children and it may be cost-effective only for some subgroups of high-risk children [ 53 ].…”
Section: Management Options For Prevention: a Public Health Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the only pharmaceutical agent available to prevent severe RSV infection in children is the RSV-specific monoclonal antibody palivizumab [ 20 , 53 – 55 ]. Compared with placebo or no intervention, palivizumab has been shown to reduce RSV hospitalisation in high-risk infants in randomised trials, with a review of five trials reporting a risk ratio (RR) of 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30–0.64) for such hospitalisations at 2-years’ follow up, although with little to no impact on mortality (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.42–1.15) [ 56 , 57 ]. However, palivizumab has not been studied in healthy children and it may be cost-effective only for some subgroups of high-risk children [ 53 ].…”
Section: Management Options For Prevention: a Public Health Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…El VSR es responsable de la mayoría de los casos de infección grave del tracto respiratorio inferior en todo el mundo, sin ( 1 4 ) e m b a r g o l o s c u a d r o s m á s s e ve r o s , l a s complicaciones y la mortalidad es mayor en países en (9) desarrollo . Aun en países desarrollados se reporta al VSR como el responsable de los cuadros severos de (15) bronquiolitis, en ausencia de comorbilidades .El anticuerpo monoclonal palivizumab reduce la infección y hospitalización por VSR principalmente en niños de alto riesgo de infección como prematuros y pacientes con comorbilidades., Sin embargo por su elevado costo, tiene disponibilidad limitada en países más pobres, y se desconoce el impacto que pueda tener en poblaciones con gran vulnerabilidad (16) social . Considerando la importancia del VSR en la gravedad del cuadro respiratorio, en nuestro estudio hemos recogido datos sobre el resultado del hisopado nasofaríngeo, pero lastimosamente, no fue realizado en todos los pacientes por falta de disponibilidad de reactivos.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Passive immunotherapy with antibodies against antigens is a treatment approach that has long been utilized in various settings. Its utility has extended to targeted treatment and prevention of viral infection using purified monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with the advent of Palivizumab, a single mAb treatment for respiratory syncytial virus ( 48 ) and, more recently the use of mAb cocktails in the fight against deadly viral outbreaks of Ebola and SARS-CoV-2 ( 49 52 ). Although a well-established approach, passive administration of allergen-specific mAbs presents a novel application of passive immunotherapy with the potential to provide a rapid and reliable treatment option for specific allergy ( Figure 1A ).…”
Section: Passive Administration Of Allergen Blocking Iggmentioning
confidence: 99%