2017
DOI: 10.1007/s40272-017-0215-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palivizumab Exposure and the Risk of Atopic Dermatitis, Asthma and Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis: A Cross-National, Population-Based Cohort Study

Abstract: Exposure to palivizumab neither increased the risk of atopic disease nor protected against asthma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 18 In standard care, infants receiving RSV immunoprophylaxis tend to have poorer baseline health status than those who do not, even within groups at high risk. 20 , 21 Consequently, observational RSV immunoprophylaxis studies require particular care to limit confounding by indication, 22 in addition to other biases. 18 Properly done immunoprophylaxis randomised controlled trials (RCTs) eliminate confounding by indication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 18 In standard care, infants receiving RSV immunoprophylaxis tend to have poorer baseline health status than those who do not, even within groups at high risk. 20 , 21 Consequently, observational RSV immunoprophylaxis studies require particular care to limit confounding by indication, 22 in addition to other biases. 18 Properly done immunoprophylaxis randomised controlled trials (RCTs) eliminate confounding by indication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have also produced conflicting evidence regarding asthma development and RSV immunoprophylaxis 44–46 . In a Dutch RCT, Scheltema et al observed that, at 6 years of age, there was a 9.9% reduction in parentally reported current asthma (defined as parent‐reported wheeze or use of asthma medication) in children who had received palivizumab as immunoprophylaxis versus a placebo group, although no reduction in physician‐diagnosed current asthma and no impact on lung function were noted 46 .…”
Section: Long‐term Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a Dutch RCT, Scheltema et al observed that, at 6 years of age, there was a 9.9% reduction in parentally reported current asthma (defined as parent‐reported wheeze or use of asthma medication) in children who had received palivizumab as immunoprophylaxis versus a placebo group, although no reduction in physician‐diagnosed current asthma and no impact on lung function were noted 46 . Conversely, cohort studies in the United States and Europe did not find any reduction in asthma associated with palivizumab treatment 44,45 …”
Section: Long‐term Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third type of prospective observational study follows non-randomized infants who received RSV mAbs [100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107] or RSV immunoglobulin [102] based on clinical indications and compares RWEC and asthma outcomes in this group to children with similar clinical profiles who did not receive RSV immunoprophylaxis. Some of these studies showed a reduction in RWEC in preschool aged children but no effect on outcomes measured at older ages [100,101,105], one found a reduction in RWEC in nonatopic but not in atopic children [103], and others found no difference in asthma by treatment status [106,107].…”
Section: Observational Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%