2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipl.2021.106174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palindromic trees for a sliding window and its applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the sliding-window suffix tree can be applied to compute minimal absent words [10] and minimal unique substrings [24], which are significant concepts for bioinformatics, in the sliding-window model. Recently, the sliding-window palindromic tree was proposed, and it can be applied to compute MUPSs in the slidingwindow model [25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, the sliding-window suffix tree can be applied to compute minimal absent words [10] and minimal unique substrings [24], which are significant concepts for bioinformatics, in the sliding-window model. Recently, the sliding-window palindromic tree was proposed, and it can be applied to compute MUPSs in the slidingwindow model [25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown in [25] that the number of changes of MUPSs is constant when we append a character or delete the first character, and we can detect the changes in amortized O(log σ) time. Further, predecessor and successor data structures on the MUPSs can be updated dynamically in O(log log n) time using van Emde Boas trees [11].…”
Section: Sliding-window Data Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Edit operations are given as queries, and they are discarded after finishing to process for the query. As related work, the set of minimal unique Data structures for computing unique palindromes in (non-)static strings palindromic substrings (MUPSs) can be maintained efficiently in the slidingwindow model [29]. Also, the set of MUPSs can be updated efficiently in the after-edit model [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that there are no more than m MUPSs in a string whose RLE size is m. Also, they proposed an O(m log σ R )-time and O(m)-space algorithm to compute all MUPSs of a string given in RLE, where m is the RLE size of the string, and σ R is the number of distinct single-character runs in the RLE string. Recently, Mieno et al [18] considered the problems of computing palindromic structures in the sliding window model. They showed that the set of MUPSs in a sliding window can be maintained in a total of O(n log σ W ) time and O(D) space while a window of size D shifts over a string of length n from the left-end to the right-end, where σ W is the maximum number of distinct characters in the windows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%