2008
DOI: 10.1130/ges00108.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paleozoic tectonic domains of Nevada: An interpretive discussion to accompany the geologic map of Nevada

Abstract: The Paleozoic geologic history of Nevada can be viewed in terms of tectonic domains derived from the newly interpreted digital geologic map of Nevada. These domains reveal that Paleozoic tectonic events were shaped by complex interactions between the continental margin in Nevada and accreted terranes outboard of the margin. Ten domains are described. They include lower Paleozoic domains based on paleogeographic facies, the Carbonate Shelf, Slope and Basin domains; the Nolan Belt domain, a structurally complex … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, more extensive U‐Pb analyses of detrital zircons led to the proposal that the Harmony A originated in central or southern Laurentia, and the Harmony B was derived from northern Laurentia (Gehrels, Dickinson, Riley, et al, ) (Figure ). Later workers suggested that the Harmony Formation was an exotic accreted terrane, based on the absence of local source terranes (Jones‐Crafford, ; Ketner et al, ).…”
Section: Approach and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, more extensive U‐Pb analyses of detrital zircons led to the proposal that the Harmony A originated in central or southern Laurentia, and the Harmony B was derived from northern Laurentia (Gehrels, Dickinson, Riley, et al, ) (Figure ). Later workers suggested that the Harmony Formation was an exotic accreted terrane, based on the absence of local source terranes (Jones‐Crafford, ; Ketner et al, ).…”
Section: Approach and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across the Great Basin of eastern Nevada and western Utah, Neoproterozoic-Devonian geologic features are characterized by the great width and thickness of north-striking miogeoclinal facies belts of the carbonate platform shelf and the Antler allochthon slope and basin (Stewart, 1980(Stewart, , 1991Turner et al, 1989;Poole et al, 1992;Cook, 2005;Crafford, 2008). This segment is also characterized by minor episodes of alkalic magmatism (Turner et al, 1989), underlying zones of both extended and intact Laurentian basement, and the presence of probable rotated crustal fault blocks at depth (Tosdal et al, 2000;Crafford and Grauch, 2002) that were reactivated during the Devonian (Emsbo et al, 1999;Morrow and Sandberg, 2008).…”
Section: Extensional Setting Of Margin Segmentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These authors state that some of the forms "***suggest a paleogeographic relationship with northwestern Canada***" and other areas extremely remote from Nevada. This information led McCollum and McCollum (1989) to the conclusion that the Antler orogeny was "a transpressional orogen within a transcurrent fault system" and it tends to confirm the conclusion of Ketner and others (2005) and Crafford (2008), based entirely on other data, that the provenance of Cambrian limestone olistoliths, as well as arkosic clasts of the Harmony Formation, was an exotic terrane transported tectonically to Nevada from northwestern Canada. Olistostromes bearing large clasts of limestone were not identified in the Inskip Formation.…”
Section: South Slopementioning
confidence: 54%